From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add .gitignore files for files generated by the hypervisor build Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:36:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20236.30074.784658.148457@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20236.30074.784658.148457@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Jackson , David Vrabel Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/01/2012 17:29, "Ian Jackson" wrote: > David Vrabel writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Add .gitignore files for files > generated by the hypervisor build"): >> More or fewer .gitignore files could be used. Let me know which is >> preferred. > > I have a branch containing a complete .gitignore for the whole tree. > > I would have absolutely no objection to submitting it. Would anyone > object to it going into tree ? I'm sure we've done both .hgignore/.gitignore in some repositories in the past. It sounds fine to me. -- Keir > Obviously we will still expect patches to come with any necessary > .hgignore updates and not necessarily updates to .gitignore. I would > be happy to be maintainer for the .gitignore (since I'm doing that > work anyway...) > > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel