xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Wei Wang <wei.wang2@amd.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Haitao Shan <haitao.shan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 of 2] vpmu: Add a vpmu cpuid function
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:54:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CB3EF874.37D58%keir@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8568566.QXZZClQmLn@amur>

On 20/01/2012 10:49, "Dietmar Hahn" <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com> wrote:

>> Our CPUID configuration is done per-domain, and from
>> tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c. CPUID adjustments implemented within the
>> hypervisor are generally not acceptable without very good reason.
> 
> Then a way is needed to have access to the opt_vpmu_enabled variable within
> the
> hypervisor from the tools to decide the enabling of the flag (is there such a
> way?) or the mechanism with the boot variable must be changed.
> The opt_vpmu_enabled boot variable was introduced because of a PMU problem in
> the Nehalem cpus leading sometimes to hypervisor crashes. But with the done
> quirk we never had a crash anymore.
> So maybe we can always switch on the vpmu stuff in the hypervisor and add a
> flag in the domain configuration when somebody wants to do some performance
> tests?

Yes!

It's obviously an option of fairly narrow interest. If someone tries to
enable the per-domain option on a CPU which has problems, you can fail the
domain creation, or print a warning in the hypervisor log, or whatever. Any
sensible option in that respect is fine by me!

 -- Keir

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-20 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-19 13:54 [PATCH 2 of 2] vpmu: Add a vpmu cpuid function Dietmar Hahn
2012-01-20 10:29 ` Keir Fraser
2012-01-20 10:49   ` Dietmar Hahn
2012-01-20 10:54     ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2012-01-20 12:40       ` Dietmar Hahn
2012-01-20 12:45         ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 13:33           ` Keir Fraser
2012-01-20 13:37             ` Ian Campbell
2012-01-20 13:47               ` Keir Fraser
2012-01-20 14:08                 ` Dietmar Hahn
2012-01-20 10:50   ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CB3EF874.37D58%keir@xen.org \
    --to=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=haitao.shan@intel.com \
    --cc=wei.wang2@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).