From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vpmu: Is CONFIG_SMP used anymore?
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:09:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CB57C21E.2A9BD%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <4F328114.60506@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F328114.60506@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 08/02/2012 14:05, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:

>>> Is CONFIG_SMP always switched on? It seems nobody tested without CONFIG_SMP.
>> Correct. !CONFIG_SMP isn't configurable or supported.
>> 
>>  -- Keir
> 
> A naive test:
> 
> andrewcoop@andrewcoop:/local/xen-unstable.hg/xen$ rgrep "CONFIG_SMP" * |
> wc -l
> 166
> 
> Seems there are quite a few bits to remove.  If noone has done so, when
> I get round to gutting #ifdef __ia64__'s from the arch/x86 tree I shall
> do the same with CONFIG_SMP.

Yeah we never actually went and deleted the !CONFIG_SMP bits we inherited
from Linux. You can feel free to clean it up afaic.

 -- Keir