From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 6] Make xen build with clang/LLVM again
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 16:55:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CBA37EFC.301F4%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <patchbomb.1333627633@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <patchbomb.1333627633@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 05/04/2012 13:07, "Tim Deegan" <tim@xen.org> wrote:

> This series makes the hypervisor build with clang/LLVM again,
> after a certain amount of bit-rot.
> 
> Some of these are obvious bug-fixes which are picked up by clang's
> slightly different -W* implementation.  Some (the spinlock change
> in particular) are working around deficiencies in clang/llvm.  I'm
> happy to change those ones to avoid any concerns people have about
> damaging the GCC build.

I don't have any comments on these beyond Jan's comments on patch 2/6. I
don't care what method you use to keep the out-of-line code ool on standard
toolchain.

 -- keir

> Cheers,
> 
> Tim.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel