From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: M A Young <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] First release candidates for Xen 4.0.4 and 4.1.3
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 08:50:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CBCE8EEB.32870%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205072123530.19527@vega-b.dur.ac.uk>
On 07/05/2012 21:52, "M A Young" <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2012, Keir Fraser wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I have just tagged first release candidates for 4.0.4 and 4.1.3:
>>
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-4.0-testing.hg (tag 4.0.4-rc1)
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-4.1-testing.hg (tag 4.1.3-rc1)
>>
>> Please test!
>
> I am seeing problems building 4.1.3-rc1 on Fedora 17, though it might be
> changes in Fedora 17 rather than xen changes that have triggered it. When
> trying to compile objects such as scheduler.c in tools/blktap2/drivers I
> get the error
> /usr/include/features.h:329:3: error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requested but
> disabled [-Werror=cpp]
>
> On checking that file I see that this is because -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> is requested with -O0 . Fedora 17 decides to warn about this and it
> becomes an error as -Werror is specified.
> This conflict occurs because of the line
> CFLAGS += -Werror -g -O0
> in tools/blktap2/drivers/Makefile
> I can of course work around the problem in my build, but I was wondering
> if optimization level 0 is still necessary for this code. I think the
> only other place -O0 is used now is tools/security/Makefile which I
> assume will also trigger the problem.
Thanks. The same appears to be true in xen-unstable also. Is the solution to
simply remove -O0 from the command line? We can test that out in
xen-unstable if so, and backport if it causes no problems.
-- Keir
> Michael Young
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-08 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-07 12:58 [ANNOUNCE] First release candidates for Xen 4.0.4 and 4.1.3 Keir Fraser
2012-05-07 17:18 ` Pavel Matěja
2012-05-07 20:03 ` Keir Fraser
2012-05-07 20:08 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-07 20:52 ` M A Young
2012-05-08 7:50 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2012-05-09 19:03 ` M A Young
2012-05-09 19:10 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-09 20:30 ` Olaf Hering
2012-05-11 15:51 ` Olaf Hering
2012-05-14 10:09 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CBCE8EEB.32870%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=m.a.young@durham.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).