From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Wei Wang <wei.wang2@amd.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] amd iommu: re-enable iommu msi if dom0 disabled it
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:31:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CC090AE8.364B8%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE35EC7020000780008B2AD@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 21/06/2012 16:49, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> the question now arises whether we really want this, and
> particularly this late before 4.2. The Linux folks don't seem to
> be willing to take the strait forward workaround for the
> problem introduced at their end, so we will likely need
> something (the more that the questionable fix already made
> it into various stable trees) before 4.2 goes out (and even
> the older trees would be affected, just that putting a change
> like this there is even more questionable).
I'd be okay seeing the proposed patch go in ahead of 4.2.0-rc1.
-- Keir
> There are obviously more potential problems in this area: If
> any of the MMIO addresses used by AMD's IOMMU is
> configurable through one of the BARs, and if Dom0 decides to
> re-assign MMIO space, neither allowing the writes nor simply
> dropping them as done here will work. Whether that's a real
> problem I don't know - Wei? And there might be other issues
> arising from dropping all writes - we might just currently not be
> aware of them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-12 12:02 [PATCH V2] amd iommu: re-enable iommu msi if dom0 disabled it Wei Wang
2012-06-12 15:13 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-12 16:08 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-06-12 16:43 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-14 12:13 ` Wei Wang
2012-06-14 14:18 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-14 15:15 ` Wei Wang
2012-06-14 15:27 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-21 9:59 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: don't disable AMD IOMMU MSI on Xen dom0 (was: Re: [PATCH V2] amd iommu: re-enable iommu msi if dom0 disabled it) Jan Beulich
2012-06-21 11:08 ` [PATCH] PCI/MSI: don't disable AMD IOMMU MSI on Xen dom0 Eric W. Biederman
2012-06-21 12:28 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-21 11:21 ` Wei Wang
2012-06-21 12:06 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-21 12:28 ` Wei Wang
2012-06-21 12:45 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-21 13:10 ` Wei Wang
2012-06-21 13:24 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-21 13:27 ` Wei Wang
2012-06-20 15:45 ` [PATCH V2] amd iommu: re-enable iommu msi if dom0 disabled it Jan Beulich
2012-06-21 15:29 ` Wei Wang
2012-06-21 15:49 ` Jan Beulich
2012-06-21 16:31 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2012-06-22 9:03 ` Wei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CC090AE8.364B8%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=wei.wang2@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).