From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Time for 4.2.0 rc0?
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:28:35 +0100
Message-ID: <CC3C3C83.39F0D%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <1343636817.14184.8.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1343636817.14184.8.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 30/07/2012 09:26, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 11:54 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> Yes, if the toolstack stuff is sorted sufficiently, we should definitely get
>>> on with the next step in the process!
>> 
>> We should give the test system a chance to push (Ian J just added the
>> leak exception) and do it early next week sometime.
> 
> We've now had a successful push.
> 
> There are some fixes pending, but nothing mega-critical so I think we
> should go ahead with rc1.
> 
> The release plan suggests weekly release candidates, does that work for
> you? If the overhead is burdensome we could go fortnightly.

The actual steps to create an RC are pretty trivial. Do you want me to tag
and sign an rc1 now? Is the qemu repo tagged with xen-4.2.0-rc1 yet?

 -- Keir

> Ian.
>