From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [xen-4.0-testing test] 13575: regressions - FAIL Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:43:23 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20516.584.592349.466383@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20516.584.592349.466383@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 09/08/2012 19:32, "Ian Jackson" wrote: > xen.org writes ("[xen-4.0-testing test] 13575: regressions - FAIL"): >> flight 13575 xen-4.0-testing real [real] >> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13575/ >> >> Regressions :-( >> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >> including tests which could not be run: >> build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 13528 >> build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 13528 >> build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 13528 >> build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 13528 > > This and the 4.1 failure are due to a miscommunication between Keir > and me about tagging the qemu trees. I have tagged them now and all > is going to be fine, I hope ... Thanks. :) > Ian. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel