From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] xen: replace XEN_GUEST_HANDLE with XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM when appropriate Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:41:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini , Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Tim Deegan (3P)" , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 13/08/2012 12:24, "Stefano Stabellini" wrote: >> I can see your point in doing this in the x86 files nevertheless for >> cosmetic/consistency reasons, but I'm really uncertain about this >> uglification when it's not really necessary (plus it would shrink the >> patch quite a bit). > > I don't have a strong opinion on this. > However it is going to be difficult to enforce XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM on > parameters anyway (because we don't have a simple way to make it fail at > compile time), if we make the change only in xen/commons, it is going to be > even harder. It has to be done everywhere, if at all. Else it's an ugly hack job.