From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: VM save/restore
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:17:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CC5B0AFC.49ED4%keir@xen.org>
References: <5032A4DE.5040307@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5032A4DE.5040307@oracle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Junjie Wei <junjie.wei@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 20/08/2012 21:58, "Junjie Wei" <junjie.wei@oracle.com> wrote:

>> The check for 64 VCPUs is to cover the fact we only save/restore a 64-bit
>> vcpumap. That would need fixing too surely, ot CPUs > 64 would be offline
>> after restore I would imagine.
>> 
>> And what is a PVM guest?
>> 
>>   -- Keir
>> 
> 
> Paravirtualization / modified kernel. Am I using the wrong term "PVM"?

Ah, I realised that in the end. They're usually just called "PV".

 -- Keir