From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@abpni.co.uk>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: Can't see more than 3.5GB of RAM / UEFI / no e820 memory map detected
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:37:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CC62F897.3D213%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503D3473.5050105@abpni.co.uk>
On 28/08/2012 22:13, "Jonathan Tripathy" <jonnyt@abpni.co.uk> wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 28/08/2012 20:36, "Jonathan Tripathy" <jonnyt@abpni.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Thanks for the clarification.
>>>>>
>>>>> So from a security/reliability standpoint, nothing will be affected by
>>>>> flipping the if block?
>>>> It should simply make it more likely that Xen sees all your RAM. ;)
>>>>
>>>> -- Keir
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I reversed the if block in setup.c and now my server can see the full
>>> 32GB of RAM. I haven't submitted a patch yet as we have run into another
>>> (possibly unrelated to xen) issue with this server build that we are
>>> working on. Once we complete our full testing, a patch will be submitted :)
>> In this case, I will re-make the patch myself and check it in. Since it is a
>> trivial one.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Keir
> Thanks Keir
>
> Will this be backported to 4.1?
Erm. Yes, I think so. It's not really sane ever to be using e801-style
memory information on modern systems, so preferring Multiboot-e820 over
Xen-e801 makes a lot of sense imo. It'll be Jan who actually does the
backports from now on, however.
-- Keir
> Cheers
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-28 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50356E43.3030208@abpni.co.uk>
2012-08-22 23:48 ` Can't see more than 3.5GB of RAM Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-23 0:11 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-23 6:06 ` Can't see more than 3.5GB of RAM / UEFI / no e820 memory map detected Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-08-23 7:22 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-08-23 7:27 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-23 7:39 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-23 8:07 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-24 15:35 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-24 17:39 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-24 20:05 ` Keir Fraser
2012-08-28 19:36 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-28 21:10 ` Keir Fraser
2012-08-28 21:13 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-28 21:37 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2012-08-28 21:41 ` Keir Fraser
2012-08-28 21:50 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-28 21:52 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-28 22:05 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-28 22:31 ` Keir Fraser
2012-08-28 22:33 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-23 8:12 ` Keir Fraser
2012-08-23 8:28 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-23 8:43 ` Keir Fraser
2012-08-23 8:49 ` Ian Campbell
2012-08-23 8:58 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-23 9:43 ` Keir Fraser
2012-08-23 9:13 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-08-23 9:50 Jonathan Tripathy
2012-08-23 11:17 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CC62F897.3D213%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jonnyt@abpni.co.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).