From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use only a single branch for upcall-pending exit path checks
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:33:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CC74FC50.4B716%keir@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504F423E020000780009A91D@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 11/09/2012 12:53, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> This utilizes the fact that the two bytes of interest are adjacent to
> one another and that the resulting 16-bit values of interest are within
> a contiguous range of numbers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S
> @@ -219,10 +219,10 @@ test_all_events:
> jnz process_nmi
> test_guest_events:
> movl VCPU_vcpu_info(%ebx),%eax
> - testb $0xFF,VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%eax)
> - jnz restore_all_guest
> - testb $0xFF,VCPUINFO_upcall_pending(%eax)
> - jz restore_all_guest
> + movzwl VCPUINFO_upcall_pending(%eax),%eax
> + decl %eax
> + cmpl $0xfe,%eax
> + ja restore_all_guest
> /*process_guest_events:*/
> sti
> leal VCPU_trap_bounce(%ebx),%edx
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/entry.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/entry.S
> @@ -108,10 +108,10 @@ ENTRY(compat_test_all_events)
> jnz compat_process_nmi
> compat_test_guest_events:
> movq VCPU_vcpu_info(%rbx),%rax
> - testb $0xFF,COMPAT_VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%rax)
> - jnz compat_restore_all_guest
> - testb $0xFF,COMPAT_VCPUINFO_upcall_pending(%rax)
> - jz compat_restore_all_guest
> + movzwl COMPAT_VCPUINFO_upcall_pending(%rax),%eax
> + decl %eax
> + cmpl $0xfe,%eax
> + ja compat_restore_all_guest
> /*compat_process_guest_events:*/
> sti
> leaq VCPU_trap_bounce(%rbx),%rdx
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/entry.S
> @@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ test_all_events:
> movl VCPU_processor(%rbx),%eax
> shl $IRQSTAT_shift,%rax
> leaq irq_stat(%rip),%rcx
> - testl $~0,(%rcx,%rax,1)
> - jnz process_softirqs
> + cmpl $0,(%rcx,%rax,1)
> + jne process_softirqs
> testb $1,VCPU_mce_pending(%rbx)
> jnz process_mce
> .Ltest_guest_nmi:
> @@ -208,10 +208,10 @@ test_all_events:
> jnz process_nmi
> test_guest_events:
> movq VCPU_vcpu_info(%rbx),%rax
> - testb $0xFF,VCPUINFO_upcall_mask(%rax)
> - jnz restore_all_guest
> - testb $0xFF,VCPUINFO_upcall_pending(%rax)
> - jz restore_all_guest
> + movzwl VCPUINFO_upcall_pending(%rax),%eax
> + decl %eax
> + cmpl $0xfe,%eax
> + ja restore_all_guest
> /*process_guest_events:*/
> sti
> leaq VCPU_trap_bounce(%rbx),%rdx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-11 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-11 11:53 [PATCH] x86: use only a single branch for upcall-pending exit path checks Jan Beulich
2012-09-11 13:33 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CC74FC50.4B716%keir@xen.org \
--to=keir@xen.org \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).