From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: move tables.c fully into .init.*
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:45:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CC7F9917.4C669%keir@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5059DD5A020000780009C523@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 19/09/2012 13:57, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 19.09.12 at 13:40, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 19/09/2012 09:58, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Of course, if you're only against the dynamic allocation, moving
>>> the array elsewhere would be another option (but would require
>>> making the symbol global, whereas here the symbol goes away
>>> altogether from the symbol tables).
>>>
>>> Yet another option would be to do the dynamic allocation where
>>> it was actually intended to be done, passing NULL here. The
>>> resizing there isn't being made use of anyway (and wouldn't
>>> work afaict), so we could as well do away with it and replace it
>>> by the simple allocation needed here (or simply fix it,
>>> considering that we might need it at some point).
>>
>> I'm not wild about any of the options really. Perhaps passing NULL would be
>> best. Still, overall, I'm not *that* bothered. You can have my Ack for the
>> original patch:
>> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
>
> As you were not really happy with it, and as I (also already in
> the past) wondered about when the broken re-allocation there
> would hit us, I decided to produce a v2, fixing and using the
> re-allocation mechanism instead.
I like that more, yes. Thanks!
> Jan
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-19 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-18 15:26 [PATCH] ACPI: move tables.c fully into .init.* Jan Beulich
2012-09-18 15:42 ` Keir Fraser
2012-09-19 7:29 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-19 7:56 ` Keir Fraser
2012-09-19 8:58 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-19 11:40 ` Keir Fraser
2012-09-19 12:57 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-19 14:45 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CC7F9917.4C669%keir@xen.org \
--to=keir@xen.org \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).