From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/tools: Add 64 bits big bar support Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:25:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FEC702B@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <403610A45A2B5242BD291EDAE8B37D300FEC702B@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Hao, Xudong" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" Cc: "Zhang, Xiantao" , "ian.campbell@citrix.com" , "jbeulich@suse.com" , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 26/09/2012 01:58, "Hao, Xudong" wrote: >>> @@ -258,8 +298,8 @@ >>> resource->base = base; >>> >>> pci_writel(devfn, bar_reg, bar_data); >>> - printf("pci dev %02x:%x bar %02x size %08x: %08x\n", >>> - devfn>>3, devfn&7, bar_reg, bar_sz, bar_data); >>> + if (using_64bar) >>> + pci_writel(devfn, bar_reg + 4, bar_data_upper); >> >> Why is the printf removed? >> > > No special reason. It's a successful print, I'll modify patch if we want to > remain it. Yes please.