From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: default-disable MWAIT-based idle driver for CPUs without ARAT Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:37:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: <506326B7020000780009E013@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <506326B7020000780009E013@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 26/09/2012 15:00, "Jan Beulich" wrote: > Without ARAT, and apparently only when using HPET broadcast mode as > replacement, CPUs occasionally fail to wake up, causing the system to > (transiently) hang. Until the reason is understood, disable the driver > on such systems. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Keir Fraser > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mwait-idle.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mwait-idle.c > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ > # define pr_debug(fmt...) > #endif > > -static __initdata bool_t no_mwait_idle; > +static __initdata s8 no_mwait_idle = -1; > invbool_param("mwait-idle", no_mwait_idle); > > static unsigned int mwait_substates; > @@ -500,6 +500,13 @@ int __init mwait_idle_init(struct notifi > if (pm_idle_save) > return -ENODEV; > > + /* XXX The no-ARAT case is supposedly being taken care of, but at > + * least some systems without ARAT hang for some reason, apparently > + * only when using HPET broadcast mode (PIT broadcast mode seems to > + * be fine). */ > + if (no_mwait_idle < 0 && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT)) > + no_mwait_idle = 0; > + > err = mwait_idle_probe(); > if (!err) { > if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT)) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel