From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: 32bit xen and "claim"
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:51:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CCBDC93D.51044%keir@xen.org>
References: <0ea96cac-0b8f-43bc-99a9-d330b4ea3d76@default>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <0ea96cac-0b8f-43bc-99a9-d330b4ea3d76@default>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 05/11/2012 19:00, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com> wrote:

> #if !defined(CONFIG_X86)
> 
> (why not #ifndef?)

We have no coding convention to prefer one over the other. Personally I
would say they are equally readable.

 -- Keir