From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: Proposed new "memory capacity claim" hypercall/feature Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 07:36:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7563be37-62f1-472e-9aec-1d0c55fa7c29@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7563be37-62f1-472e-9aec-1d0c55fa7c29@default> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Dan Magenheimer , Jan Beulich Cc: TimDeegan , Olaf Hering , IanCampbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , George Shuklin , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, DarioFaggioli , Kurt Hackel , Zhigang Wang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/11/2012 22:17, "Dan Magenheimer" wrote: > I think this brings us back to the proposed "claim" hypercall/subop. > Unless there are further objections or suggestions for different > approaches, I'll commence prototyping it, OK? Yes, in fact I thought you'd started already! K.