From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: Xen 4.3 development update Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:22:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <51360523.4050803@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51360523.4050803@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: David Vrabel , Jan Beulich Cc: George Dunlap , Jean Guyader , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/03/2013 14:45, "David Vrabel" wrote: > On 05/03/13 14:36, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 05.03.13 at 13:44, George Dunlap wrote: >>> * V4V: Inter-domain communication >>> owner (Xen): jean.guyader@citrix.com >>> status (Xen): patches submitted >>> prognosis: ? >> >> Last I recall was that all issues I had pointed out had been >> addressed. It would be Keir needing to ack and/or commit them, >> if no-one else spotted any issues with this code. > > We're taking at look at the v4v patches and at the moment we're not > happy with the quality as-is. I think there were some locking bugs and > issues with the compat code. I also have to make a judgement call on it. I want to be sure that it really is providing something useful beyond what can be built out of existing primitives, and that we don't lower the bar for acceptance because it's a Citrix submission. I don't think we do, but I'm wary of it. -- Keir > Dominic (CCc'd) is doing the work and he should be able to give more > details. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel