xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] XSA-52..54 follow-up
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:00:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CDD37934.28A25%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ADBA6102000078000DAEAA@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 04/06/2013 08:58, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> The first patch really isn't as much of a follow-up than what triggered
> the security issues to be noticed in the first place.
> 
> 1: x86: preserve FPU selectors for 32-bit guest code
> 2: x86: fix XCR0 handling
> 3: x86/xsave: adjust state management
> 4: x86/fxsave: bring in line with recent xsave adjustments
> 
> The first two I would see as candidates for 4.3 (as well as
> subsequent backporting, albeit I realize that especially the first
> one is non-trivial), while the third is code improvement only,
> and the fourth is really just cleanup, and hence I'd be fine with
> deferring them until after 4.3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

I like the patches, 1 & 2 are good bug fixes.
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>

Patch #1 is quite scary though! I wonder really whether these long-lived
issues must be fixed right now, let alone backported?

 -- Keir

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-04 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-04  7:58 [PATCH 0/4] XSA-52..54 follow-up Jan Beulich
2013-06-04  8:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: preserve FPU selectors for 32-bit guest code Jan Beulich
2013-06-04  8:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: fix XCR0 handling Jan Beulich
2013-06-04  8:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/xsave: adjust state management Jan Beulich
2013-06-04  8:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/fxsave: bring in line with recent xsave adjustments Jan Beulich
2013-06-04 10:00 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2013-06-04 10:09   ` [PATCH 0/4] XSA-52..54 follow-up George Dunlap
2013-06-04 10:45     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-04 10:47       ` George Dunlap
2013-06-04 13:58         ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-04 14:55           ` George Dunlap
2013-06-04 10:32   ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-04 12:43     ` Ben Guthro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CDD37934.28A25%keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).