xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: fix initialization of wallclock time for PVHVM on migration
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:12:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CDDD0B0B.29BC3%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B74971.4020104@citrix.com>

On 11/06/2013 16:59, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:

>> Hmm I can't find any confirmation that my patch actually *did* work. :( I'm
>> sure I remember testing it though!
>> 
>> My suggestion is we do indeed remove the inner if() in latch_shinfo_size().
>> Ie. Call update_domain_wallclock_time() even if shinfo size has apparently
>> not changed. 
>> 
>> We only latch shinfo size on hypercall page initialisation and on setup of
>> the callback irq. They are start-of-day/resume operations, so removing the
>> if() should have no bad side effect that I can see. If nothing else it
>> should make this wallclock-field setup more robust.
> 
> So it would be better to call update_domain_wallclock_time
> unconditionally on latch_shinfo_size rather than doing it on
> XENMAPSPACE_shared_info?
> 
> Conceptially it makes more sense IMHO to do it in the call to
> XENMAPSPACE_shared_info.

I would still make the fix in latch_shinfo_size() and perhaps add an extra
call to latch_shinfo_size() from the call to XENMAPSPACE_shared_info. But
actually I am sure you will find it unnecessary and at this point for Xen
4.3 I think the smallest possible patch wins.

 -- Keir

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-11 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-11 10:46 [PATCH] xen: fix initialization of wallclock time for PVHVM on migration Roger Pau Monne
2013-06-11 11:59 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 12:01   ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 12:12     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 13:59       ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-11 14:04         ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 13:36           ` Egger, Christoph
2013-06-11 12:17   ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 13:15     ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 14:02     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 13:38   ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 14:16     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 14:41       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-11 15:05       ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-11 15:45         ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-11 15:59           ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 16:12             ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2013-06-11 16:14               ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 15:59           ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 13:50           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 13:55             ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 15:50     ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CDDD0B0B.29BC3%keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).