From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm: Ensure useful progress in alloc_l2_table() Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:41:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1372854537-4897-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1372854537-4897-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , Xen-devel Cc: Tim Deegan , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 03/07/2013 13:28, "Andrew Cooper" wrote: > While debugging the issue which turned out to be XSA-58, a printk in this loop > showed that it was quite easy to never make useful progress, because of > consistently failing the preemption check. > > One single l2 entry is a reasonable amount of work to do, even if an action is > pending, and also assures forwards progress across repeat continuations. > > Tweak the continuation criteria to fail on the first iteration of the loop. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper > Cc: Keir Acked-by: Keir Fraser > Cc: Jan Beulich > Cc: Tim Deegan > > --- > Changes since v1: > * Dont move the continuation block to the end > --- > xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > index 77dcafc..f151dec 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c > @@ -1278,7 +1278,8 @@ static int alloc_l2_table(struct page_info *page, > unsigned long type, > > for ( i = page->nr_validated_ptes; i < L2_PAGETABLE_ENTRIES; i++ ) > { > - if ( preemptible && i && hypercall_preempt_check() ) > + if ( preemptible && i > page->nr_validated_ptes > + && hypercall_preempt_check() ) > { > page->nr_validated_ptes = i; > rc = -EAGAIN;