From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ACPI: fixes to acpi_os_map_memory() Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:20:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <52139CE102000078000ED1BD@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VBnja-0003wJ-00 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:20:38 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hr7so557167wib.0 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:20:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52139CE102000078000ED1BD@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 20/08/2013 15:44, "Jan Beulich" wrote: > 1: ACPI: fix acpi_os_map_memory() > 2: ACPI: use ioremap() in acpi_os_map_memory() > > While this could have been done in one step for unstable, backports to > older trees (where we don't have a proper ioremap()) will become better > aligned with the unstable commits this way - the first patch can be > backported, while the second would at most go into 4.3-testing. > > This fixes booting on upcoming systems of a vendor who couldn't make > up their minds whether they would want to be named here (and hence > I'm keeping them anonymous), where various of the ACPI registers > traditionally located in I/O space show up in "System Memory" instead. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Keir Fraser > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel