xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix race between sched_move_domain() and vcpu_wake()
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:47:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CE7DA3D3.39085%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381426196-11392-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com>

On 10/10/2013 18:29, "David Vrabel" <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:

> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> 
> sched_move_domain() changes v->processor for all the domain's VCPUs.
> If another domain, softirq etc. triggers a simultaneous call to
> vcpu_wake() (e.g., by setting an event channel as pending), then
> vcpu_wake() may lock one schedule lock and try to unlock another.
> 
> vcpu_schedule_lock() attempts to handle this but only does so for the
> window between reading the schedule_lock from the per-CPU data and the
> spin_lock() call.  This does not help with sched_move_domain()
> changing v->processor between the calls to vcpu_schedule_lock() and
> vcpu_schedule_unlock().
> 
> Fix the race by taking the schedule_lock for v->processor in
> sched_move_domain().
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
> Cc: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> Cc: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-11 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-10 17:29 [PATCH] sched: fix race between sched_move_domain() and vcpu_wake() David Vrabel
2013-10-10 18:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-10 18:27   ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-11  7:12     ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11  8:07       ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-11  9:02         ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-11  9:32           ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11  9:36             ` David Vrabel
2013-10-11  9:37               ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11 12:20             ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11 14:39               ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11 14:45               ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11 15:00                 ` Processed: " xen
2013-10-11 10:36       ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11  6:37 ` Juergen Gross
2013-10-11 10:32 ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11 11:15   ` Dario Faggioli
2013-10-11 11:32     ` George Dunlap
2013-10-11 11:49       ` Dario Faggioli
2013-10-11 12:03         ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-11 11:47 ` Keir Fraser [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CE7DA3D3.39085%keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).