From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/3 v2] x86/irq: local_irq_restore() should not blindly popf
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 19:37:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CE8B330D.39F76%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526572B6.3030803@citrix.com>
On 21/10/2013 19:30, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> #define read_segment_register(name) \
>>> ({ u16 __sel; \
>>> @@ -159,15 +160,19 @@ static always_inline unsigned long __cmpxchg(
>>> #define local_irq_restore(x) \
>>> ({ \
>>> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(x) != sizeof(long)); \
>>> - asm volatile ( "push" __OS " %0 ; popf" __OS \
>>> - : : "g" (x) : "memory", "cc" ); \
>>> + asm volatile ( \
>>> + "pushf" __OS "\n\t" \
>>> + "and" __OS " %0, (%%" __OP "sp)\n\t" \
>>> + "orw %1, (%%" __OP "sp)\n\t" \
>>> + "popf" __OS "\n\t" : : "g" ( ~X86_EFLAGS_IF ), \
>> Would this be better as a constant constraint ("i")?
>
> I was wondering what the best practice for this would be.
>
> In most cases, I would imagine that an immediate would be used.
> However, as this is a define and therefore forcibly inlined everywhere
> it is used, it is just possible that the compiler could find a
> ~X86_EFLAGS_IF already in context, and optimise down to an "and r64,r/m64".
Oh, g includes i, I forgot that. Well your choice is best then.
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
> ~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-21 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-21 13:41 [PATCH 0/3] irqsave/restore improvements Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/irq: local_irq_restore() should not blindly popf Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 13:58 ` David Vrabel
2013-10-21 14:09 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-21 14:32 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-21 15:24 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-21 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-21 16:33 ` [Patch 1/3 v2] " Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 18:18 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-21 18:30 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 18:37 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2013-10-22 8:35 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-22 8:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-10-22 9:28 ` Jan Beulich
2013-10-22 10:14 ` [PATCH 1/3 v3] " Andrew Cooper
2013-10-22 13:27 ` Keir Fraser
2013-10-29 14:53 ` [Patch 1/3 v2] " Jan Beulich
2013-10-21 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen: Widen flags parameter for spinlock_irqsave() and friends Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 13:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] common/spinlock: Ensure the flags parameter is wide enough Andrew Cooper
2013-10-21 15:15 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-21 14:08 ` [PATCH 0/3] irqsave/restore improvements Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CE8B330D.39F76%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).