xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@intel.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] VMX: don't crash processing 'd' debug key
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:13:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CEA6887E.3DC3A%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5280E1C00200007800101D47@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 11/11/2013 12:55, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

> There's a window during scheduling where "current" and the active VMCS
> may disagree: The former gets set much earlier than the latter. Since
> both vmx_vmcs_enter() and vmx_vmcs_exit() immediately return when the
> subject vCPU is "current", accessing VMCS fields would, depending on
> whether there is any currently active VMCS, either read wrong data, or
> cause a crash.
> 
> Going forward we might want to consider reducing the window during
> which vmx_vmcs_enter() might fail (e.g. doing a plain __vmptrld() when
> v->arch.hvm_vmx.vmcs != this_cpu(current_vmcs) but arch_vmx->active_cpu
> == -1), but that would add complexities (acquiring and - more
> importantly - properly dropping v->arch.hvm_vmx.vmcs_lock) that don't
> look worthwhile adding right now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

This is a little ugly but I can't think of a nicer way.

Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-11 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-07 10:44 [PATCH] VMX: don't crash processing 'd' debug key Jan Beulich
2013-11-07 14:34 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-11-07 14:49   ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-07 15:35     ` Andrew Cooper
2013-11-07 19:08 ` Tim Deegan
2013-11-08 16:04   ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-08 16:09     ` Andrew Cooper
2013-11-08 16:11       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-11-08 16:15       ` Jan Beulich
2013-11-08 16:55       ` Tim Deegan
2013-11-11 12:55         ` [PATCH v3] " Jan Beulich
2013-11-11 13:13           ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2013-11-08 16:07   ` [PATCH v2] " Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CEA6887E.3DC3A%keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).