From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: eliminate has_arch_mmios()
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:37:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CEA7DF8B.3E1FB%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528238A9020000780010257F@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 12/11/2013 13:18, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> ... as being generally insufficient: Either has_arch_pdevs() or
> cache_flush_permitted() should be used (in particular, it is
> insufficient to consider MMIO ranges alone - I/O port ranges have the
> same requirements if available to a guest).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #include <asm/debugreg.h>
> #include <asm/msr.h>
> #include <asm/i387.h>
> +#include <asm/iocap.h>
> #include <asm/spinlock.h>
> #include <asm/hvm/emulate.h>
> #include <asm/hvm/hvm.h>
> @@ -1973,7 +1974,7 @@ static void wbinvd_ipi(void *info)
>
> static void svm_wbinvd_intercept(void)
> {
> - if ( has_arch_mmios(current->domain) )
> + if ( cache_flush_permitted(current->domain) )
> on_each_cpu(wbinvd_ipi, NULL, 1);
> }
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <xen/perfc.h>
> #include <asm/current.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/iocap.h>
> #include <asm/regs.h>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> @@ -2236,10 +2237,7 @@ static void wbinvd_ipi(void *info)
>
> static void vmx_wbinvd_intercept(void)
> {
> - if ( !has_arch_mmios(current->domain) )
> - return;
> -
> - if ( iommu_snoop )
> + if ( !cache_flush_permitted(current->domain) || iommu_snoop )
> return;
>
> if ( cpu_has_wbinvd_exiting )
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/domain.h
> @@ -316,7 +316,6 @@ struct arch_domain
> } __cacheline_aligned;
>
> #define has_arch_pdevs(d) (!list_empty(&(d)->arch.pdev_list))
> -#define has_arch_mmios(d) (!rangeset_is_empty((d)->iomem_caps))
>
> #define gdt_ldt_pt_idx(v) \
> ((v)->vcpu_id >> (PAGETABLE_ORDER - GDT_LDT_VCPU_SHIFT))
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-12 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-12 13:18 [PATCH] x86: eliminate has_arch_mmios() Jan Beulich
2013-11-12 13:37 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CEA7DF8B.3E1FB%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).