From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [Patch v3 0/2] Remove figlet from the source tree Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:15:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1385721828.25763.8.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1385721828.25763.8.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Keir Fraser , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , Xen-devel , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 29/11/2013 10:43, "Ian Campbell" wrote: > On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 19:45 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: >> On 25/11/2013 14:38, "Ian Jackson" wrote: >> >>> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch v3 0/2] Remove figlet from the >>> source tree"): >>>> It doesn't quite disappear it is just printed as normal ASCII text >>>> instead. >>>> >>>> We could include a static "Xen" banner figlet output and just print the >>>> version in normal ASCII text. Or we could check in the figlet banner and >>>> make it part of the release process to update it (liable to forgetting >>>> though, so I'm not in favour of this). >>> >>> I far prefer the approach in Andrew's patch. >> >> Personally I think we should just get rid of the banner entirely. > > In the absence of such a patch I think Andrew's series is a step in the > right direction. > > Any objections to me merging it? Not from me. -- Keir > Ian. >