From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lars Kurth Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add myself for kconfig Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:19:06 +0000 Message-ID: References: <567141D1.7010606@cardoe.com> <1450276916-24096-1-git-send-email-cardoe@cardoe.com> <1451995643.13361.244.camel@citrix.com> <568D288202000078000C3F4E@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20160106142648.GA8994@deinos.phlegethon.org> <22157.16687.218537.9204@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <22157.16687.218537.9204@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <7869F59576AC5F4B8DC924A9C809804C@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: "Keir (Xen.org)" , Ian Campbell , "Tim (Xen.org)" , Doug Goldstein , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org What is the outcome of this discussion? Lars On 06/01/2016 16:30, "Ian Jackson" wrote: >Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add myself for kconfig"): >> As we have seen last year in the survey, in theory - aka according to >>our >> governance - committers should always act on the wishes (ACKs) of >> maintainers. In practice it comes down to whether the committers trusts >>a >> maintainer enough to apply patches without a re-review. If we follow the >> trust principle, which IMHO is not really in conflict with the >>governance, >> there shouldn't be an issue. > >Precisely. > >> That is unless, we plan to make changes to >> how we operate, for which there does not seem to be consensus. > >Quite. > >Ian.