xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Clarify the meaning of nested maintainership
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:59:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D33EC422.286F0%lars.kurth@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461254590-5984-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@citrix.com>



On 21/04/2016 17:03, "George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com> wrote:

>Clarify the meaning of nested maintainership.
>
>Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
>---
>
> MAINTAINERS | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>index a34685d..be901d5 100644
>--- a/MAINTAINERS
>+++ b/MAINTAINERS
>@@ -94,6 +94,40 @@ Descriptions of section entries:
> 	      printk, pr_info or pr_err
> 	   One regex pattern per line.  Multiple K: lines acceptable.
> 
>+
>+The meaning of nesting:
>+
>
>[snip]

>+ - In the case of a disagreement between maintainers, THE REST can
>+ vote to settle the matter.  (This should be very exceptional indeed.)

This creates a slight conflict with the project governance, which states
that committers act as referees in case of disagreements. As REST
maintainers are a superset of committers, this could create a potential
mismatch.

Given, that the text says "can", I don't have an issue with it. It merely
adds an extra level of complexity when it comes to resolving disagreements
and maybe could be confusing.

Regards
Lars

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 16:03 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Clarify the meaning of nested maintainership George Dunlap
2016-04-21 16:59 ` Lars Kurth [this message]
2016-04-26 16:19   ` George Dunlap
2016-04-26 16:57     ` Lars Kurth
2016-04-27 11:34       ` George Dunlap
2016-04-22  3:55 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-22  8:29 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-22 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-22 18:33 ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D33EC422.286F0%lars.kurth@citrix.com \
    --to=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).