From: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Clarify the meaning of nested maintainership
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:59:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D33EC422.286F0%lars.kurth@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461254590-5984-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@citrix.com>
On 21/04/2016 17:03, "George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com> wrote:
>Clarify the meaning of nested maintainership.
>
>Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
>---
>
> MAINTAINERS | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>index a34685d..be901d5 100644
>--- a/MAINTAINERS
>+++ b/MAINTAINERS
>@@ -94,6 +94,40 @@ Descriptions of section entries:
> printk, pr_info or pr_err
> One regex pattern per line. Multiple K: lines acceptable.
>
>+
>+The meaning of nesting:
>+
>
>[snip]
>+ - In the case of a disagreement between maintainers, THE REST can
>+ vote to settle the matter. (This should be very exceptional indeed.)
This creates a slight conflict with the project governance, which states
that committers act as referees in case of disagreements. As REST
maintainers are a superset of committers, this could create a potential
mismatch.
Given, that the text says "can", I don't have an issue with it. It merely
adds an extra level of complexity when it comes to resolving disagreements
and maybe could be confusing.
Regards
Lars
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 16:03 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Clarify the meaning of nested maintainership George Dunlap
2016-04-21 16:59 ` Lars Kurth [this message]
2016-04-26 16:19 ` George Dunlap
2016-04-26 16:57 ` Lars Kurth
2016-04-27 11:34 ` George Dunlap
2016-04-22 3:55 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-22 8:29 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-22 16:33 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-22 18:33 ` Julien Grall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D33EC422.286F0%lars.kurth@citrix.com \
--to=lars.kurth@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).