From: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Slow (higher scheduling latency?) system after S3 - regression 4.17 -> 4.19 ?
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2025 14:23:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPzBO_eW8mQHM66u@mail-itl> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1328 bytes --]
Hi,
After updating from Xen 4.17 to 4.19 it appears that I have some
performance issues if system was suspended before. For now this is just
vague observation, as I don't have much data yet.
Generally, the user observable effect is that audio playback (over
Qubes's PV audio thing) becomes very choppy, beyond usefulness (cannot
make audio calls anymore, music/video playback also becomes useless with
some players. For me this suggests some increased latency in scheduling
- maybe some timer fires too late?
This doesn't happen always, but I'd say quite often after S3, sometimes
may need two or three suspend cycles to trigger the issue. But it's
possible it is also some other factor, like which pCPU the VM gets
scheduled on, maybe? But for now I didn't hit this issue before
performing any S3. I don't have a reliable reproducer yet.
While I write it's related to 4.17 -> 4.19 update, there is also slight
possibility it's related to hardware change (CFL -> MTL). But, it's
unlikely, since I'd probably get much more bug reports about that (the
stable Qubes version uses 4.17, and we have many users on MTL).
What would be the method to collect some useful debugging info? Some
debug-keys (r? a?), some cmdline options?
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
reply other threads:[~2025-10-25 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aPzBO_eW8mQHM66u@mail-itl \
--to=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).