Re: [PATCH 4/7] x86/traps: Rename compat_hypercall() to entry_int82()

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>]

On 03/05/17 09:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 02.05.17 at 20:05, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/traps.c
>> @@ -3872,7 +3872,7 @@ void __init trap_init(void)
>>  
>>      /* The 32-on-64 hypercall vector is only accessible from ring 1. */
>>      _set_gate(idt_table + HYPERCALL_VECTOR,
>> -              SYS_DESC_trap_gate, 1, &compat_hypercall);
>> +              SYS_DESC_trap_gate, 1, &entry_int82);
> Would you mind at once dropping the unnecessary & ?

Fixed.

>
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/processor.h
>> @@ -529,6 +529,8 @@ DECLARE_TRAP_HANDLER(simd_coprocessor_error);
>>  DECLARE_TRAP_HANDLER_CONST(machine_check);
>>  DECLARE_TRAP_HANDLER(alignment_check);
>>  
>> +DECLARE_TRAP_HANDLER(entry_int82);
> This is inappropriate, I think: There's no do_entry_int82. With this
> changed to a simply void entry_int82(void) declaration
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

I hadn't even realised I had split the introduction of the two functions
across two patches, but I'd prefer to keep them split like this and I
will ensure that this gets committed at the same time as the following
patch.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel