From: PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@gmail.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: OOPS new Xen 4.9.0_08 / kernel 4.12.0 Dom0 crash @ domain_crash_sync called from entry.S: fault at ffff82d080342328 entry.o#create_bounce_frame+0x135/0x14d
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:27:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af071515-0966-7ac0-e9c7-41d1e1afefc6@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <595CB83C02000078001689D5@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On 7/5/17 12:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> So there are two problems here: One is the fact that the kernel
> really should put an Invalid Opcode exception handler in place
> before intentionally raising any such exceptions (which WARN()
> and WARN_ON() do). The other is that Linux commit 636259880a
> ("efi: Add support for seeding the RNG from a UEFI config table")
> failed to also update arch/x86/xen/efi.c, so the caller
> (efi_config_parse_tables()) tries to map a gigantic amount of
> memory, based on the value it found at NULL (which it then uses
> as the size to map). Luckily the fix for it is in Linus'es tree already -
> commit 6c64447ec5 ("x86/xen/efi: Initialize only the EFI struct
> members used by Xen"). It's marked for stable backport, but it
> fails to mention the commit it fixes.
iiuc, sounds like
-- wait for in-the-pipeline @kernel fixes to simply propagate
-- nothing to be done @xen
yes?
need add'l info from here?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-05 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-04 19:48 OOPS new Xen 4.9.0_08 / kernel 4.12.0 Dom0 crash @ domain_crash_sync called from entry.S: fault at ffff82d080342328 entry.o#create_bounce_frame+0x135/0x14d PGNet Dev
2017-07-04 19:54 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-07-05 0:14 ` PGNet Dev
2017-07-05 7:58 ` Jan Beulich
2017-07-05 17:27 ` PGNet Dev [this message]
2017-07-05 22:02 ` Daniel Kiper
2017-07-05 22:12 ` PGNet Dev
2017-07-06 6:42 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af071515-0966-7ac0-e9c7-41d1e1afefc6@gmail.com \
--to=pgnet.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).