From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] X86/XEN: Merge x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done setup functions and document its semantic Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:36:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <1345580561-8506-1-git-send-email-attilio.rao@citrix.com> <20120822135753.GA30964@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20120911124359.GA5459@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120911124359.GA5459@phenom.dumpdata.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Attilio Rao , Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > > The overall result is basically the same, but it's way simpler to look > > > > at obvious and well done patches than checking whether a subtle copy > > > > and paste bug happened in 3/5 of the first version. Copy and paste is > > > > the #1 cause for subtle bugs. :) > > > > > > > > I'm waiting for the ack of Xen folks before taking it into tip. > > In case you are waiting for that - Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > Sorry missed the previous ack over traveling. > > Having it in tip in an extra branch which you pull into your > > tree. That's the easiest one. > > ping? Which branch should I pull? tip/x86/platform head commit: 6428227 Thanks, tglx