From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2601C54F4D for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1374786.1621987 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1wojKh-0001gF-BR; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:03:03 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1374786.1621987; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:03:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1wojKh-0001g8-80; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:03:03 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1374786; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:03:02 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1wojKf-0001g2-Vt for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:03:01 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wojKf-00DTlH-0t; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:03:01 +0000 Received: from 224.pool85-54-217.dynamic.orange.es ([85.54.217.224] helo=localhost) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wojKe-007zid-29; Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:03:00 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:02:54 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Andrew Cooper , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Anthony PERARD , Michal Orzel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] time: shorten year determination loop Message-ID: References: <79d50725-3892-4643-b854-bfec9c0c0d79@suse.com> <7bed7164-9a53-4e53-9fc1-7af68108bdf8@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7bed7164-9a53-4e53-9fc1-7af68108bdf8@suse.com> On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 11:30:11AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > For dates very far into the future (the MC146818 RTC's century byte can go > up to the 99th century), the present year-wise loop would become somewhat > inefficient (taking perhaps several thousand iterations). Prefix that loop > with a 400-year granular calculation (somewhat like the earlier loop does > for dates in the past). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné Thanks, Roger.