From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7EF5CA5FCE for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 09:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1440641.1658040 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1xDexx-00011Q-B5; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 09:26:37 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1440641.1658040; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 09:26:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1xDexx-00011J-7W; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 09:26:37 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1440641; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 09:26:35 +0000 Received: from mx.expurgate.net ([194.145.224.20]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1xDexv-00010N-T7 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 09:26:35 +0000 Received: from mx.expurgate.net (helo=localhost) by mx.expurgate.net with esmtp id 1xDexv-00BvIv-9j for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 11:26:35 +0200 Received: from [10.42.69.1] (helo=localhost) by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate MTA 0.9.1) (envelope-from ) id 6ac36d40-bab6-0a2a0a5309dd-0a2a4501c15c-36 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 11:26:34 +0200 Received: from [170.10.133.124] (helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com) by tlsNG-d62444.mxtls.expurgate.net with ESMTPS (eXpurgate 4.57.1) (envelope-from ) id 6ac36d49-5984-0a2a45010019-aa0a857c7b95-3 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 11:26:34 +0200 Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-578-N6hTJVhvPH-NDifGdYGF_A-1; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 05:26:29 -0400 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB15419236B0; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 09:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (headnet03.pony-001.prod.iad2.dc.redhat.com [10.2.32.114]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 631281956044; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 09:26:25 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" Authentication-Results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=mimecast20190719 header.d=redhat.com header.i="@redhat.com" header.h="From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1791192393; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=cCc57hc9JUT01LxypoVVFPFOwLInLi3iRPdYV2t4GiQ=; b=QBnnyVp+byChjWJWxeOp6l19z1cg9t9bT46vK/1hcMz6IT5Ya8vUjjJCR+TEOKOVkNY8jH pR/W1NFN378x6WXjxSt/o4Mvf1jqCM1IWL+ollYuAoAoQcLx7gyxdUNSK2rMBZ7d8GodzY CrpDNodv3AzZp6zvrKF8tA/tBxD3wag= X-MC-Unique: N6hTJVhvPH-NDifGdYGF_A-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: N6hTJVhvPH-NDifGdYGF_A_1791192388 Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 10:26:22 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: marcandre.lureau@redhat.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/28] hw: define most common PCI types as secure Message-ID: Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= References: <20260911143627.2743803-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20260911143627.2743803-16-berrange@redhat.com> <179096166122.3025252.2345560702508398440.b4-review@b4> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <179096166122.3025252.2345560702508398440.b4-review@b4> User-Agent: Mutt/2.4.2 (2026-08-30) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: Fi64AEVRSU2nhdG0qqxlmkdklR6Fo4Nj26zBC9LE-bQ_1791192388 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-purgate-ID: tlsNG-d62444/1791192394-BCB45757-B4D9F5C1/0/0 X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-size: 870 On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 09:21:01PM +0400, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote: > > Essentially all PCI infrastructure is in scope for the virtualization > > use case, aside from the niche simba bridge. > > > > You should exclude the CXL bits though, as stated on cover letter. Yes. > Also questionable perhaps: xio3130, pcie_pci, pxb The latter two are both reasonable as long as i440fx is around, and xio3130 is a core documented part of QEMU's PCI-Express support, though I've never understood why one would want it over pcie-pxb. Overall, I think all the generic PCI/PCI-E infra is in scope. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com ~~ https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :| |: https://libvirt.org ~~ https://entangle-photo.org :| |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange ~~ https://fstop138.berrange.com :|