xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: wei.liu2@citrix.com, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>,
	roger.pau@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/domctl: Add XEN_DOMCTL_set_avail_vcpus
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 08:33:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b274b37b-deb1-e38c-98aa-6164ba123c97@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58355CE5020000780012123F@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 11/23/2016 03:09 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 23.11.16 at 00:47, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>> I have a prototype that replaces XEN_DOMCTL_set_avail_vcpus with 
>> XEN_DOMCTL_acpi_access and it seems to work OK. The toolstack needs to 
>> perform two (or more, if >32 VCPUs) hypercalls and the logic on the 
>> hypervisor side is almost the same as the ioreq handling that this 
>> series added in patch 8.
> Why would there be multiple hypercalls needed? (I guess I may need
> to see the prototype to understand.)

The interface is

#define XEN_DOMCTL_acpi_access 81
struct xen_domctl_acpi_access {
    uint8_t rw;
    uint8_t bytes;
    uint16_t port;
    uint32_t val;
};

And so as an example, to add VCPU1 to already existing VCPU0:

/* Update the VCPU map*/
val = 3;
xc_acpi_access(ctx->xch, domid, WRITE, 0xaf00, 1/*bytes*/, &val);

/* Set event status in GPE block */
val= 1 << 2;
xc_acpi_access(ctx->xch, domid, WRITE, 0xafe0, 1/*bytes*/, &val);


If we want to support ACPI registers in memory space then we need to add
'uint8_t space' and extend val to uint64_t. We also may want to make val
a uint64_t to have fewer hypercalls for VCPU map updates. (We could, in
fact, pass a pointer to the map but I think a scalar is cleaner.)


>
>> However, I now realized that this interface will not be available to PV 
>> guests (and it will only become available to HVM guests when we move 
>> hotplug from qemu to hypervisor). And it's x86-specific.
> As you make clear below, the PV aspect is likely a non-issue. But
> why is this x86-specific? It's generic ACPI, isn't it?

Mostly because I don't know how ARM handles hotplug. I was told that ARM
does not use PRST, it uses PSCI, which I am not familiar with.

The interface is generic enough to be used by any architecture.

-boris

>
>
>> This means that PV guests will not know what the number of available 
>> VCPUs is and therefore we will not be able to enforce it. OTOH we don't 
>> know how to do that anyway since PV guests bring up all VCPUs and then 
>> offline them.
>>
>> -boris
>
>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-23 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-21 21:00 [PATCH v3 00/11] PVH VCPU hotplug support Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] x86/domctl: Add XEN_DOMCTL_set_avail_vcpus Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 10:31   ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 10:39     ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 12:34       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 13:59         ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 14:37           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 15:07             ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 15:43               ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 16:01                 ` Jan Beulich
     [not found]                   ` <a4ac4c28-833b-df5f-ce34-1fa72f7c4cd2@oracle.com>
2016-11-22 23:47                     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-23  8:09                       ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-23 13:33                         ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-11-23 13:58                           ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-23 14:16                             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-25 18:16                               ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-28  7:59                                 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 12:19     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] acpi: Define ACPI IO registers for PVH guests Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 10:37   ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 12:28     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 14:07       ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 14:53         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 15:13           ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 15:52             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 16:02               ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] pvh: Set online VCPU map to avail_vcpus Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] acpi: Make pmtimer optional in FADT Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] acpi: Power and Sleep ACPI buttons are not emulated for PVH guests Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] acpi: PVH guests need _E02 method Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22  9:13   ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 20:20   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] pvh/ioreq: Install handlers for ACPI-related PVH IO accesses Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 11:34   ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 12:38     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 14:08       ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-28 15:16         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-28 15:48           ` Roger Pau Monné
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] pvh/acpi: Handle ACPI accesses for PVH guests Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 14:11   ` Paul Durrant
2016-11-22 15:01   ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 15:30     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 16:05       ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 16:33         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] events/x86: Define SCI virtual interrupt Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 15:25   ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-22 15:57     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 16:07       ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] pvh: Send an SCI on VCPU hotplug event Boris Ostrovsky
2016-11-22 15:32   ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-21 21:00 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] docs: Describe PVHv2's VCPU hotplug procedure Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b274b37b-deb1-e38c-98aa-6164ba123c97@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).