From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/24] x86/emul: Clean up the naming of the retire union
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:58:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b55538a753a44d6c862930f35aec8926@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480513841-7565-8-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.cooper3@citrix.com]
> Sent: 30 November 2016 13:50
> To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
> Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>; Jan Beulich
> <JBeulich@suse.com>; Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 07/24] x86/emul: Clean up the naming of the retire union
>
> Rename byte to raw, as the field being a single byte long is an
> implementation
> detail. Make the bitfields part of an anonymous struct to remove the .flags
> qualifier. Change the types of the flags to being booleans, to match their
> use.
>
Is it legitimate to use a bool in a bitfield? Also, anonymous unions are not part of C99 AFAIK... are we now stipulating something more recent?
Paul
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
>
> v3:
> * New
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c | 6 +++---
> xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c | 10 +++++-----
> xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h | 10 +++++-----
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> index bc259ec..fe62500 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> @@ -1791,13 +1791,13 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct
> hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt,
> new_intr_shadow = hvmemul_ctxt->intr_shadow;
>
> /* MOV-SS instruction toggles MOV-SS shadow, else we just clear it. */
> - if ( hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.retire.flags.mov_ss )
> + if ( hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.retire.mov_ss )
> new_intr_shadow ^= HVM_INTR_SHADOW_MOV_SS;
> else
> new_intr_shadow &= ~HVM_INTR_SHADOW_MOV_SS;
>
> /* STI instruction toggles STI shadow, else we just clear it. */
> - if ( hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.retire.flags.sti )
> + if ( hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.retire.sti )
> new_intr_shadow ^= HVM_INTR_SHADOW_STI;
> else
> new_intr_shadow &= ~HVM_INTR_SHADOW_STI;
> @@ -1808,7 +1808,7 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct
> hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt,
> hvm_funcs.set_interrupt_shadow(curr, new_intr_shadow);
> }
>
> - if ( hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.retire.flags.hlt &&
> + if ( hvmemul_ctxt->ctxt.retire.hlt &&
> !hvm_local_events_need_delivery(curr) )
> {
> hvm_hlt(regs->eflags);
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> index 9c28ed4..416812e 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.c
> @@ -1905,7 +1905,7 @@ x86_decode(
> state->eip = ctxt->regs->eip;
>
> /* Initialise output state in x86_emulate_ctxt */
> - ctxt->retire.byte = 0;
> + ctxt->retire.raw = 0;
>
> op_bytes = def_op_bytes = ad_bytes = def_ad_bytes = ctxt-
> >addr_size/8;
> if ( op_bytes == 8 )
> @@ -2668,7 +2668,7 @@ x86_emulate(
>
> case 0x17: /* pop %%ss */
> src.val = x86_seg_ss;
> - ctxt->retire.flags.mov_ss = 1;
> + ctxt->retire.mov_ss = 1;
> goto pop_seg;
>
> case 0x1e: /* push %%ds */
> @@ -2996,7 +2996,7 @@ x86_emulate(
> if ( (rc = load_seg(seg, src.val, 0, NULL, ctxt, ops)) != 0 )
> goto done;
> if ( seg == x86_seg_ss )
> - ctxt->retire.flags.mov_ss = 1;
> + ctxt->retire.mov_ss = 1;
> dst.type = OP_NONE;
> break;
>
> @@ -4033,7 +4033,7 @@ x86_emulate(
>
> case 0xf4: /* hlt */
> generate_exception_if(!mode_ring0(), EXC_GP, 0);
> - ctxt->retire.flags.hlt = 1;
> + ctxt->retire.hlt = 1;
> break;
>
> case 0xf5: /* cmc */
> @@ -4247,7 +4247,7 @@ x86_emulate(
> if ( !(_regs.eflags & EFLG_IF) )
> {
> _regs.eflags |= EFLG_IF;
> - ctxt->retire.flags.sti = 1;
> + ctxt->retire.sti = 1;
> }
> break;
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> index b0f0304..ef39601 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_emulate/x86_emulate.h
> @@ -468,12 +468,12 @@ struct x86_emulate_ctxt
>
> /* Retirement state, set by the emulator (valid only on X86EMUL_OKAY).
> */
> union {
> + uint8_t raw;
> struct {
> - uint8_t hlt:1; /* Instruction HLTed. */
> - uint8_t mov_ss:1; /* Instruction sets MOV-SS irq shadow. */
> - uint8_t sti:1; /* Instruction sets STI irq shadow. */
> - } flags;
> - uint8_t byte;
> + bool hlt:1; /* Instruction HLTed. */
> + bool mov_ss:1; /* Instruction sets MOV-SS irq shadow. */
> + bool sti:1; /* Instruction sets STI irq shadow. */
> + };
> } retire;
> };
>
> --
> 2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-30 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-30 13:50 [PATCH for-4.9 v3 00/24] XSA-191 followup Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/24] x86/shadow: Fix #PFs from emulated writes crossing a page boundary Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/24] x86/emul: Drop X86EMUL_CMPXCHG_FAILED Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/24] x86/emul: Simplfy emulation state setup Andrew Cooper
2016-12-08 6:34 ` George Dunlap
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/24] x86/emul: Rename hvm_trap to x86_event and move it into the emulation infrastructure Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/24] x86/emul: Rename HVM_DELIVER_NO_ERROR_CODE to X86_EVENT_NO_EC Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 06/24] x86/pv: Implement pv_inject_{event, page_fault, hw_exception}() Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 10:06 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 07/24] x86/emul: Clean up the naming of the retire union Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:58 ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2016-11-30 14:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 14:05 ` Paul Durrant
2016-11-30 16:43 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 10:08 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 08/24] x86/emul: Correct the behaviour of pop %ss and interrupt shadowing Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 10:18 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 10:51 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:19 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 09/24] x86/emul: Provide a wrapper to x86_emulate() to ASSERT() certain behaviour Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 10:40 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 10:58 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:21 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 10/24] x86/emul: Always use fault semantics for software events Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 17:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-01 10:53 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 11:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:23 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 11/24] x86/emul: Implement singlestep as a retire flag Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 14:28 ` Paul Durrant
2016-12-01 11:16 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 11:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:33 ` Tim Deegan
2016-12-01 12:05 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 12/24] x86/emul: Remove opencoded exception generation Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 13/24] x86/emul: Rework emulator event injection Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 14:26 ` Paul Durrant
2016-12-01 11:35 ` Tim Deegan
2016-12-01 12:31 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 14/24] x86/vmx: Use hvm_{get, set}_segment_register() rather than vmx_{get, set}_segment_register() Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 15/24] x86/hvm: Reposition the modification of raw segment data from the VMCB/VMCS Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 16/24] x86/emul: Avoid raising faults behind the emulators back Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 17/24] x86/pv: " Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:50 ` Tim Deegan
2016-12-01 12:57 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 13:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 13:27 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 18/24] x86/shadow: " Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 11:39 ` Tim Deegan
2016-12-01 11:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-12-01 13:00 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-01 13:15 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 19/24] x86/hvm: Extend the hvm_copy_*() API with a pagefault_info pointer Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 20/24] x86/hvm: Reimplement hvm_copy_*_nofault() in terms of no pagefault_info Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 21/24] x86/hvm: Rename hvm_copy_*_guest_virt() to hvm_copy_*_guest_linear() Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 22/24] x86/hvm: Avoid __hvm_copy() raising #PF behind the emulators back Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 14:29 ` Paul Durrant
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 23/24] x86/emul: Prepare to allow use of system segments for memory references Andrew Cooper
2016-11-30 13:50 ` [PATCH v3 24/24] x86/emul: Use system-segment relative memory accesses Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b55538a753a44d6c862930f35aec8926@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
--to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).