xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
Cc: Kevin Stange <kevin@steadfast.net>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: PCI Device Subtree Change from Traditional to Upstream
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:38:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b96b8dcec4944918a41c60ab63bdf841@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b101965-dfeb-61a2-ab15-8fb75330e536@citrix.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xen-devel [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org] On Behalf
> Of George Dunlap
> Sent: 25 January 2018 18:15
> To: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> Cc: Kevin Stange <kevin@steadfast.net>; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@citrix.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] PCI Device Subtree Change from Traditional to
> Upstream
> 
> On 01/25/2018 06:04 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 05:54:36PM +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 01/04/2018 12:52 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> >>> From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] libxl_dm: Explicitly put xen-platform device on PCI slot
> 3
> >>>
> >>> In order to do that, we don't use xenfv machine anymore and explicity
> >>> add the platform device on the command line.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>
> >>
> >> Anthony,
> >>
> >> It seems like we might want to add the ability to specify which slot we
> >> want the xen-platform device to occupy. Is it worth thinking of the best
> >> way to add a patch like this upstream?
> >
> > I think that would be nice for people who switch from qemu-trad to
> > QEMU. The only question that remain is, how to name the xl config
> > option?  The rest is to simply take my libxl patch and make it use
> > the new config option.
> 
> Well the other half would be to make sure something like this doesn't
> happen by accident in the future -- i.e., that no future changes in QEMU
> will accidentally move it away from whatever the current slot is now.
> 

IMO, it would be best if libxl specified the bus topology exactly (i.e. specified devfn for everything that appears on the bus). If we, as I hope, make a move to having Xen rather than QEMU own the topology then this should hopefully ensure at least some degree of forward compatibility.

  Paul

>  -George
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 10:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-20 17:40 PCI Device Subtree Change from Traditional to Upstream Kevin Stange
2017-12-20 17:44 ` George Dunlap
2018-01-03 17:57 ` Anthony PERARD
2018-01-03 23:10   ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-04 12:52     ` Anthony PERARD
2018-01-04 13:26       ` Paul Durrant
2018-01-04 21:17         ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-05  9:03           ` Paul Durrant
2018-01-05 17:05             ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-04 21:16       ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-05 17:10         ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-05 20:56           ` Kevin Stange
2018-01-25 17:54       ` George Dunlap
2018-01-25 18:04         ` Anthony PERARD
2018-01-25 18:14           ` George Dunlap
2018-01-26 10:38             ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2019-04-08  9:46               ` George Dunlap
2019-04-08  9:46                 ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2019-04-08  9:51                 ` Paul Durrant
2019-04-08  9:51                   ` [Xen-devel] " Paul Durrant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b96b8dcec4944918a41c60ab63bdf841@AMSPEX02CL03.citrite.net \
    --to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=kevin@steadfast.net \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).