Re: [Hackathon Minutes] Xen 4.4 Planning

[Gordan Bobic <gordan@bobich.net>]

 On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:45:52 +0100, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> 
 wrote:
>>>> On 14.06.13 at 11:59, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I also wanted to add to the point that Alex has made on serious bugs 
>> in xen
>> vs. kvm : this gets raised regularly by Xen users when I attend
>> conferences. And I also heard a few times now that we appear to 
>> focus more
>> on sexy features rather than the basics. This is relatively new 
>> though: the
>> first time I noticed was towards the end of last year. Which does 
>> not mean
>> that this is new: it may just mean that top issues/concerns that 
>> were
>> frequently raised before (mainly trust in the future of the project) 
>> have
>> disappeared.
>
> I'd really like to see examples of this - there ought to be quite a
> few according to what you write, yet I don't seem to recall any
> that got plainly ignored. Of course there are always bugs which
> take longer than others to figure out and fix.

 Not a bug per se, but arguably a relatively important feature; does
 the lack of feature to pass multiple USB devices to domU
 count as an example of this?

 Gordan