From: 0bo0 <0.bugs.only.0@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, horms@verge.net.au, dexuan.cui@intel.com
Subject: Re: with Xen4 config -> (pci-passthrough-strict-check no), DomU init reports "Error: pci: PCI Backend and pci-stub don't own device"
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:11:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c67eed301001291511h43503d42oa7e251dfcec912be@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100129224445.GA5852@phenom.dumpdata.com>
I bleieve you have it backwards, no?
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
>> grep passthrough /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp
>> (pci-passthrough-strict-check no)
>> grep hide /etc/modprobe.d/99-local.conf
>> options pciback hide=(0000:04:07.0)(0000:04:06.0)
>
> That won't work. That option is only useful if pciback is compiled
> in the kernel. To be exact, you would need this in your bootline
> argument:
> xen-pciback.hide=(04:07.0)(04:06.0) pci=resource_alignment=04:07.0
>
>
>>
>> and checking,
>>
>> lsmod | egrep -i "pciback|xen"
>> pciback 54471 0
>> xenbus_be 3474 4 netbk,blkbk,blktap,pciback
>
> Since it is module you need to follow the documentation about how to
> seize and bind using pciback. Google is your friend.
>
reading @
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Assign_hardware_to_DomU_with_PCIBack_as_module
"If the Dom0 XenLinux kernel is built with pciback as a module,
attempting to use the kernel command-line parameter pciback.hide won't
work. '
...
"If the Dom0 XenLinux kernel is built with pciback as a module,
attempting to use the kernel command-line parameter pciback.hide won't
work. This includes loading pciback in an initrd. This means that if
you wish to assign hardware to a DomU another method is needed.
There are two possibilities. ..."
since Dom0 is, apparently, "built with pciback as a module", the wiki
specifically instructs:
Add a line to /etc/modprobe.conf to pass the hide parameter to pciback
options pciback hide=(0000:05:02.0)
You'll also note, from the dmesg output i'd included above, that
there's no problem seizing the *1st* card, configured in the same
manner.
and, all of this worked just fine before the most recent Xen4 update
(this morning ...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-29 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-29 22:10 with Xen4 config -> (pci-passthrough-strict-check no), DomU init reports "Error: pci: PCI Backend and pci-stub don't own device" 0bo0
2010-01-29 22:36 ` 0bo0
2010-01-29 22:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-01-29 23:11 ` 0bo0 [this message]
2010-02-01 16:57 ` 0bo0
2010-02-01 18:28 ` 0bo0
2010-02-01 18:58 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2010-02-01 19:21 ` 0bo0
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c67eed301001291511h43503d42oa7e251dfcec912be@mail.gmail.com \
--to=0.bugs.only.0@gmail.com \
--cc=dexuan.cui@intel.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).