xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/14] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:19:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9e2b990-df98-a46e-72a4-7cfb77d480ba@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161222164420.5onbaw6f4k3clhna@dhcp-3-221.uk.xensource.com>

On 12/22/2016 11:44 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 09:24:02AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 22.12.16 at 17:17, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/22/2016 07:17 AM, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>>> Maybe Boris has some ideas about how to do CPU hotplug for Dom0?
>>> Why would Xen need to be able to parse the AML that is intended to be
>>> executed by dom0? I'd think that all the hypervisor would need to do is
>>> to load it into memory, not any different from how it's done for regular
>>> guests.
>> Well, if Dom0 executed the unmodified _MAT, it would get back
>> data relating to the physical CPU. Roger is overriding MADT to
>> present virtual CPU information to Dom0, and this would likewise
>> need to happen for the _MAT return value.

By "unmodified _MAT" you mean system's _MAT?  Why can't we provide our
own that will return _MAT object properly adjusted for dom0? We are
going to provide our own (i.e. not system's) DSDT, aren't we?

> This is one of the problems with this Dom/Xen0 split brain problem that we
> have, and cannot get away from.
>
> To clarify a little bit, I'm not overwriting the original MADT in memory, so
> Dom0 should still be able to access it if the implementation of _MAT returns
> data from that area. AFAICT when plugging in a physical CPU (pCPU) into the
> hardware, Dom0 should see "correct" data returned by the _MAT method. However
> (as represented by the " I've used), this data will not match Dom0 vCPU
> topology, and should not be used by Dom0 (only reported to Xen in order to
> bring up the new pCPU).

So the problem seems to be that we need to run both _MATs --- system's
and dom0's.


> Then the problem arises because we have no way to perform vCPU hotplug for
> Dom0, not at least as it is done for DomU (using ACPI), so we would have to use
> an out-of-band method in order to do vCPU hotplug for Dom0, which is a PITA.


I would very much like to avoid this.

-boris



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-22 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-30 16:49 [PATCH v4 00/14] Initial PVHv2 Dom0 support Roger Pau Monne
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] xen/x86: remove XENFEAT_hvm_pirqs for PVHv2 guests Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-08 16:21   ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-16 11:24     ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] xen/x86: fix return value of *_set_allocation functions Roger Pau Monne
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] xen/x86: allow calling {shadow/hap}_set_allocation with the idle domain Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-01 11:25   ` Tim Deegan
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] x86/paging: introduce paging_set_allocation Roger Pau Monne
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] xen/x86: split the setup of Dom0 permissions to a function Roger Pau Monne
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] x86/vtd: refuse to enable IOMMU if the PCI scan fails Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-01  0:29   ` Tian, Kevin
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] x86/iommu: add IOMMU entries for p2m_mmio_direct pages Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-08 16:24   ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-16 14:01     ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] xen/x86: allow the emulated APICs to be enabled for the hardware domain Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-08 16:29   ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] xen/x86: split Dom0 build into PV and PVHv2 Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-09 16:07   ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-16 14:28     ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-16 14:45       ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-16 16:17         ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-16 17:57           ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-19  7:42             ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-16 15:28       ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-16 16:15         ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-16 16:18       ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-16 17:42         ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-19  7:41           ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] xen/x86: populate PVHv2 Dom0 physical memory map Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-09 16:48   ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-16 17:38     ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-19  7:48       ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] xen/x86: parse Dom0 kernel for PVHv2 Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-09 17:05   ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-20 17:34     ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] x86/PVHv2: fix dom0_max_vcpus so it's capped to 128 for PVHv2 Dom0 Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-09 17:09   ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] xen/x86: hack to setup PVHv2 Dom0 CPUs Roger Pau Monne
2016-11-30 16:49 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] xen/x86: setup PVHv2 Dom0 ACPI tables Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-12 13:56   ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-21 16:32     ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-21 17:04       ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-22 10:43         ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-22 11:03           ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-22 12:17             ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-22 16:17               ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-22 16:24                 ` Jan Beulich
2016-12-22 16:44                   ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-22 18:19                     ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-12-23 10:27                       ` Roger Pau Monne
2016-12-23 15:13                         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-23 15:31                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-12-23 15:35                             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-23 16:02                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2016-12-23 17:13                                 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-03 15:55                                   ` Roger Pau Monne
2017-01-03 19:13                                     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-12-23 15:21                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-01-03  7:53                       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d9e2b990-df98-a46e-72a4-7cfb77d480ba@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).