xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Vijay Kilari <vijay.kilari@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/24] ARM: GICv3: allocate LPI pending and property table
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:22:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd2a20c0-948f-2fe5-01d4-160eb1cb499b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALicx6sJz0sYJgo4n9TWTn6vz4rb4wg-SYC5or69jA3eJv2Zzw@mail.gmail.com>

On 24/10/16 15:28, Vijay Kilari wrote:

Hi Vijay,

thanks for having a look!

> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>> The ARM GICv3 ITS provides a new kind of interrupt called LPIs.
>> The pending bits and the configuration data (priority, enable bits) for
>> those LPIs are stored in tables in normal memory, which software has to
>> provide to the hardware.
>> Allocate the required memory, initialize it and hand it over to each
>> ITS. We limit the number of LPIs we use with a compile time constant to
>> avoid wasting memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  xen/arch/arm/Kconfig              |  6 ++++
>>  xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h       |  1 -
>>  xen/arch/arm/gic-its.c            | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c             | 27 ++++++++++++++
>>  xen/include/asm-arm/cache.h       |  4 +++
>>  xen/include/asm-arm/gic-its.h     | 22 +++++++++++-
>>  xen/include/asm-arm/gic_v3_defs.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  7 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> index 9fe3b8e..66e2bb8 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -50,6 +50,12 @@ config HAS_ITS
>>          depends on ARM_64
>>          depends on HAS_GICV3
>>
>> +config HOST_LPI_BITS
>> +        depends on HAS_ITS
>> +        int "Maximum bits for GICv3 host LPIs (14-32)"
>> +        range 14 32
>> +        default "20"
>> +
>>  config ALTERNATIVE
>>         bool
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h b/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h
>> index 045d6ce..dc64aec 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/efi/efi-boot.h
>> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>>  #include "efi-dom0.h"
>>
>>  void noreturn efi_xen_start(void *fdt_ptr, uint32_t fdt_size);
>> -void __flush_dcache_area(const void *vaddr, unsigned long size);
>>
>>  #define DEVICE_TREE_GUID \
>>  {0xb1b621d5, 0xf19c, 0x41a5, {0x83, 0x0b, 0xd9, 0x15, 0x2c, 0x69, 0xaa, 0xe0}}
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-its.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-its.c
>> index 0f42a77..b52dff3 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-its.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-its.c
>> @@ -20,10 +20,86 @@
>>  #include <xen/lib.h>
>>  #include <xen/device_tree.h>
>>  #include <xen/libfdt/libfdt.h>
>> +#include <asm/p2m.h>
>>  #include <asm/gic.h>
>>  #include <asm/gic_v3_defs.h>
>>  #include <asm/gic-its.h>
>>
>> +/* Global state */
>> +static struct {
>> +    uint8_t *lpi_property;
>> +    int host_lpi_bits;
>> +} lpi_data;
>> +
>> +/* Pending table for each redistributor */
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, pending_table);
>> +
>> +#define MAX_HOST_LPI_BITS                                                \
>> +        min_t(unsigned int, lpi_data.host_lpi_bits, CONFIG_HOST_LPI_BITS)
>> +#define MAX_HOST_LPIS   (BIT(MAX_HOST_LPI_BITS) - 8192)
>> +
>> +uint64_t gicv3_lpi_allocate_pendtable(void)
>> +{
>> +    uint64_t reg, attr;
>> +    void *pendtable;
>> +
>> +    attr  = GIC_BASER_CACHE_RaWaWb << GICR_PENDBASER_INNER_CACHEABILITY_SHIFT;
>> +    attr |= GIC_BASER_CACHE_SameAsInner << GICR_PENDBASER_OUTER_CACHEABILITY_SHIFT;
>> +    attr |= GIC_BASER_InnerShareable << GICR_PENDBASER_SHAREABILITY_SHIFT;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * The pending table holds one bit per LPI, so we need three bits less
>> +     * than the number of LPI_BITs. But the alignment requirement from the
>> +     * ITS is 64K, so make order at least 16 (-12).
>> +     */
>> +    pendtable = alloc_xenheap_pages(MAX(lpi_data.host_lpi_bits - 3, 16) - 12, 0);
> 
>     The pend table size allocated is differ from proptable size?

According to the spec the pending table always covers all LPIs that the
ITS advertises, consequently GICR_PENDBASER has no field to indicate the
size of the table.

> 
>> +    if ( !pendtable )
>> +        return 0;
>> +
>> +    memset(pendtable, 0, BIT(lpi_data.host_lpi_bits - 3));
>          memset size is different from allocated size?

We just clean what the ITS needs. A potentially bigger allocation above
is just to match the alignment requirement. I didn't find a nice
function to allocate pages with a specific alignment beyond a single page.

>          flushing zeroed pendtable?
>> +    this_cpu(pending_table) = pendtable;
>> +
>> +    reg  = attr | GICR_PENDBASER_PTZ;
>> +    reg |= virt_to_maddr(pendtable) & GENMASK(51, 16);
>      can use __pa instead of virt_to_maddr()
>      Isn't GENMASK(47, 12) here?

Please download the newest revision (issue C) of the spec. Issue B
extended physical address space to cover 52 bits in many places.

>> +
>> +    return reg;
>> +}
>> +
>> +uint64_t gicv3_lpi_get_proptable()
>> +{
>> +    uint64_t attr;
>> +    static uint64_t reg = 0;
>> +
>> +    /* The property table is shared across all redistributors. */
>> +    if ( reg )
>> +        return reg;
>> +
>> +    attr  = GIC_BASER_CACHE_RaWaWb << GICR_PENDBASER_INNER_CACHEABILITY_SHIFT;
>> +    attr |= GIC_BASER_CACHE_SameAsInner << GICR_PENDBASER_OUTER_CACHEABILITY_SHIFT;
>> +    attr |= GIC_BASER_InnerShareable << GICR_PENDBASER_SHAREABILITY_SHIFT;
> 
>      using PENDBASER definitions for PROPBASER?

Good catch.

>> +
>> +    lpi_data.lpi_property = alloc_xenheap_pages(MAX_HOST_LPI_BITS - 12, 0);
>> +    if ( !lpi_data.lpi_property )
>> +        return 0;
>> +
>> +    memset(lpi_data.lpi_property, GIC_PRI_IRQ | LPI_PROP_RES1, MAX_HOST_LPIS);
>> +    __flush_dcache_area(lpi_data.lpi_property, MAX_HOST_LPIS);
>> +
>> +    reg  = attr | ((MAX_HOST_LPI_BITS - 1) << 0);
>> +    reg |= virt_to_maddr(lpi_data.lpi_property) & GENMASK(51, 12);
>    Isn't GENMASK(47, 12)?
>> +
>> +    return reg;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int gicv3_lpi_init_host_lpis(int lpi_bits)
>> +{
>> +    lpi_data.host_lpi_bits = lpi_bits;
>> +
>> +    printk("GICv3: using at most %ld LPIs on the host.\n", MAX_HOST_LPIS);
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  void gicv3_its_dt_init(const struct dt_device_node *node)
>>  {
>>      const struct dt_device_node *its = NULL;
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
>> index 238da84..2534aa5 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v3.c
>> @@ -546,6 +546,9 @@ static void __init gicv3_dist_init(void)
>>      type = readl_relaxed(GICD + GICD_TYPER);
>>      nr_lines = 32 * ((type & GICD_TYPE_LINES) + 1);
>>
>> +    if ( type & GICD_TYPE_LPIS )
>> +        gicv3_lpi_init_host_lpis(((type >> GICD_TYPE_ID_BITS_SHIFT) & 0x1f) + 1);
>> +
>>      printk("GICv3: %d lines, (IID %8.8x).\n",
>>             nr_lines, readl_relaxed(GICD + GICD_IIDR));
>>
>> @@ -615,6 +618,26 @@ static int gicv3_enable_redist(void)
>>
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>> +static void gicv3_rdist_init_lpis(void __iomem * rdist_base)
>> +{
>> +    uint32_t reg;
>> +    uint64_t table_reg;
>> +
>> +    if ( list_empty(&host_its_list) )
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    /* Make sure LPIs are disabled before setting up the BASERs. */
>> +    reg = readl_relaxed(rdist_base + GICR_CTLR);
>> +    writel_relaxed(reg & ~GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS, rdist_base + GICR_CTLR);
>> +
>> +    table_reg = gicv3_lpi_allocate_pendtable();
>> +    if ( table_reg )
>> +        writeq_relaxed(table_reg, rdist_base + GICR_PENDBASER);
>> +
>> +    table_reg = gicv3_lpi_get_proptable();
> 
>    Here LPI property table is allocated per cpu. One property table
> should be enough and can be shared by all cpus.

The function is called _get_ and not _allocate_, multiple calls to it
returns the same pointer, allocated on the first incarnation by the
magic of a function-local, static variable. See the above:
	if ( reg ) return reg;

>> +    if ( table_reg )
>> +        writeq_relaxed(table_reg, rdist_base + GICR_PROPBASER);
>     After updating GICR_PENDBASER and GICR_PROPBASER regs
> shouldn't we read back and check if sharability bits are support by HW or not
> like it is done in linux driver?

Possibly.

Cheers,
Andre.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-02 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-28 18:24 [RFC PATCH 00/24] [FOR 4.9] arm64: Dom0 ITS emulation Andre Przywara
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 01/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: parse and store ITS subnodes from hardware DT Andre Przywara
2016-10-26  1:11   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-01 15:13   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-14 17:35     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-23 15:39       ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 02/24] ARM: GICv3: allocate LPI pending and property table Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 14:28   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-02 16:22     ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2016-10-26  1:10   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 15:29     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-10 21:00       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-01 17:22   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-15 11:32     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-23 15:58       ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 03/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: allocate device and collection table Andre Przywara
2016-10-09 13:55   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-10-10  9:05     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 14:30   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-02 17:51     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-26 22:57   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-01 17:34     ` Julien Grall
2016-11-10 15:32     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-10 21:06       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-01 18:19   ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 04/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: map ITS command buffer Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 14:31   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-10-26 23:03   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 16:04     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-02 13:38   ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 05/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: introduce ITS command handling Andre Przywara
2016-10-26 23:55   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-10-27 21:52     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 15:57     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-02 15:05   ` Julien Grall
2017-01-31  9:10     ` Andre Przywara
2017-01-31 10:23       ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 06/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: introduce host LPI array Andre Przywara
2016-10-27 22:59   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-02 15:14     ` Julien Grall
2016-11-10 17:22     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-10 21:48       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 07/24] ARM: GICv3 ITS: introduce device mapping Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:31   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-03 19:33     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-28  0:08   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 08/24] ARM: GICv3: introduce separate pending_irq structs for LPIs Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:31   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-03 19:47     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-28  1:04   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-01-12 19:14     ` Andre Przywara
2017-01-13 19:37       ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-01-16  9:44         ` André Przywara
2017-01-16 19:16           ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-04 15:46   ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 09/24] ARM: GICv3: forward pending LPIs to guests Andre Przywara
2016-10-28  1:51   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 10/24] ARM: GICv3: enable ITS and LPIs on the host Andre Przywara
2016-10-28 23:07   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 11/24] ARM: vGICv3: handle virtual LPI pending and property tables Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:32   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-03 20:21     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-04 11:53       ` Julien Grall
2016-10-29  0:39   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-03-29 15:47     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-02 17:18   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-02 17:41     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-02 18:03       ` Julien Grall
2016-11-02 18:09         ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-01-31  9:10     ` Andre Przywara
2017-01-31 10:38       ` Julien Grall
2017-01-31 12:04         ` Andre Przywara
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 12/24] ARM: vGICv3: introduce basic ITS emulation bits Andre Przywara
2016-10-09 14:20   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-10-10 10:38     ` Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:31   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-03 19:26     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-04 12:07       ` Julien Grall
2016-11-03 17:50   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-08 23:54   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 13/24] ARM: vITS: handle CLEAR command Andre Przywara
2016-11-04 15:48   ` Julien Grall
2016-11-09  0:39   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-09 13:32     ` Julien Grall
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 14/24] ARM: vITS: handle INT command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  0:42   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 15/24] ARM: vITS: handle MAPC command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  0:48   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 16/24] ARM: vITS: handle MAPD command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  0:54   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 17/24] ARM: vITS: handle MAPTI command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  1:07   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 18/24] ARM: vITS: handle MOVI command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  1:13   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 19/24] ARM: vITS: handle DISCARD command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  1:28   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 20/24] ARM: vITS: handle INV command Andre Przywara
2016-11-09  1:49   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 21/24] ARM: vITS: handle INVALL command Andre Przywara
2016-10-24 15:32   ` Vijay Kilari
2016-11-04  9:22     ` Andre Przywara
2016-11-10  0:21       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 11:57         ` Julien Grall
2016-11-10 20:42           ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-11 15:53             ` Julien Grall
2016-11-11 20:31               ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-18 18:39                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-25 16:10                   ` Julien Grall
2016-12-01  1:19                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-02 16:18                       ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-03  0:46                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-05 13:36                           ` Julien Grall
2016-12-05 19:51                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-06 15:56                               ` Julien Grall
2016-12-06 19:36                                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-06 21:32                                   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 21:53                                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-06 22:01                                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-06 22:12                                         ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 23:13                                         ` Julien Grall
2016-12-07 20:20                                           ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-09 18:01                                             ` Julien Grall
2016-12-09 20:13                                               ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-09 18:07                                             ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-09 20:18                                               ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-14  2:39                                                 ` George Dunlap
2016-12-16  1:30                                                   ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 22:39                                       ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 23:24                                         ` Julien Grall
2016-12-07  0:17                                           ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-07 20:21                                         ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-09 10:14                                           ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-06 21:36                               ` Dario Faggioli
2016-12-09 19:00                           ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-10  0:30                             ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-12-12 10:38                               ` Andre Przywara
2016-12-14  0:38                                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 22/24] ARM: vITS: create and initialize virtual ITSes for Dom0 Andre Przywara
2016-11-10  0:38   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 23/24] ARM: vITS: create ITS subnodes for Dom0 DT Andre Przywara
2016-09-28 18:24 ` [RFC PATCH 24/24] ARM: vGIC: advertising LPI support Andre Przywara
2016-11-10  0:49   ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-11-10 11:22     ` Julien Grall
2016-11-02 13:56 ` [RFC PATCH 00/24] [FOR 4.9] arm64: Dom0 ITS emulation Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd2a20c0-948f-2fe5-01d4-160eb1cb499b@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=vijay.kilari@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).