From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/cpuid: Hide VT-x/SVM from HVM-based control domains
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:13:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd4c1e45-c827-0d40-5236-57370859e200@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea887188-f321-5e16-e82d-787949e402ac@cardoe.com>
On 19/01/17 03:56, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On 1/18/17 2:40 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> The VT-x/SVM features are hidden from PV dom0 by the pv_featureset[] upper
>> mask, but nothing thusfar has prevented the features being visible in
> thus far? Could be the difference between British English and American
> English.
Just a lack of a space on my behalf.
>
>> HVM-based control domains (where there is no toolstack decision to hide the
>> features).
>>
>> As a side effect of calling nestedhvm_enabled() earlier during domain
>> creation, it needs to cope with the params[] array array not having been
> array array?
Both fixed.
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-19 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-18 19:40 [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpuid: Handling of simple leaves in guest_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-18 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/cpuid: Hide VT-x/SVM from HVM-based control domains Andrew Cooper
2017-01-19 3:56 ` Doug Goldstein
2017-01-19 14:13 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2017-01-20 15:44 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-24 14:38 ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-01-24 15:10 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-24 15:41 ` Roger Pau Monné
2017-01-24 16:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-18 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/cpuid: Remove BUG_ON() condition from guest_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-19 3:57 ` Doug Goldstein
2017-01-20 15:45 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-18 19:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/cpuid: Handle leaf 0 in guest_cpuid() Andrew Cooper
2017-01-19 4:02 ` Doug Goldstein
2017-01-20 15:48 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-18 19:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/cpuid: Handle leaf 0x80000000 " Andrew Cooper
2017-01-19 4:03 ` Doug Goldstein
2017-01-20 15:58 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-20 16:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-18 19:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/cpuid: Handle the long vendor string " Andrew Cooper
2017-01-19 4:03 ` Doug Goldstein
2017-01-20 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
2017-01-20 16:03 ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-18 19:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/cpuid: Only recalculate the shared feature bits once Andrew Cooper
2017-01-19 4:03 ` Doug Goldstein
2017-01-19 11:01 ` Wei Liu
2017-01-20 16:06 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd4c1e45-c827-0d40-5236-57370859e200@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=cardoe@cardoe.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).