From: Sarah Newman <srn@prgmr.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: Can't always start 32 bit domains after 64 bit domains
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:06:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd9a4dba-a4ea-9edf-491f-30f68ca94636@prgmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd1dec0f-cb92-54a6-e7d2-db6051edb187@prgmr.com>
On 11/21/2016 11:37 AM, Sarah Newman wrote:
> On 11/21/2016 05:21 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 21/11/16 10:05, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>>>>> Back in the xend days someone here had invented a (crude) mechanism
>>>>> to set aside memory for 32-bit PV domains, but I don't think dealing with
>>>>> this situation in xl has ever seen any interest.
>>>> If I wanted to add that, where would it go?
>>> I don't know, that's a question for xl folks I guess.
>>
>> IIRC, given no other constraints, the Xen heap allocation allocates from
>> the top down to help this exact case.
>
> Yes, that's what I thought it did too, though I can't find my source information for that.
>
>>
>> I suspect that libxl's preference towards NUMA allocation of domains
>> interferes with this, by adding a NUMA constraints to memory allocations
>> for 64bit PV guests.
>
> I ran xl info -n (which I didn't know about before) and that shows the problem much more clearly.
>
> If that's the reason not all the higher memory is being used first: is a potential workaround to pin 64 bit domains to the second physical core on
> boot, and 32 bit domains to the first physical core on boot, and then change the allowed cores with 'xl vcpu-pin' after the domain is loaded?
Free memory on a test server with no domains:
node: memsize memfree distances
0: 148480 142983 10,21
1: 147456 144645 21,10
Free memory booting 116 256M 64-bit domains, limited to cpus='all,^0-1' on boot:
node: memsize memfree distances
0: 148480 128416 10,21
1: 147456 129669 21,10
Free memory booting 116 256M 64-bit domains, limited to cpus='12-23' on boot:
node: memsize memfree distances
0: 148480 143397 10,21
1: 147456 114693 21,10
This looks like a viable workaround. Where should I document it?
--Sarah
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-21 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3423fa13-18bd-ff7b-f44a-af015eda2eb7@prgmr.com>
2016-11-19 21:22 ` Can't always start 32 bit domains after 64 bit domains Sarah Newman
2016-11-21 8:20 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-21 9:45 ` Sarah Newman
2016-11-21 10:05 ` Jan Beulich
2016-11-21 13:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-11-21 19:37 ` Sarah Newman
2016-11-21 21:06 ` Sarah Newman [this message]
2016-11-22 18:46 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-11-22 19:37 ` Sarah Newman
2016-11-22 21:40 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-11-27 1:14 ` Dario Faggioli
2016-11-27 2:46 ` Sarah Newman
2016-11-22 18:37 ` Dario Faggioli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd9a4dba-a4ea-9edf-491f-30f68ca94636@prgmr.com \
--to=srn@prgmr.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).