From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Credit2 scheduler prototype
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:48:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de76405a0912080648r4fc91cf9v876682a5383ac654@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C742EFC4.3C2C%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
My main concern is that sharing the runqueue between cores requires
some changes to the core context switch code. The kinks aren't 100%
worked out yet, so there's a risk that there will be an impact on the
correctness of the credit1 scheduler.
If you want to go that route, we should probably talk about the
changes we want to the context switch path first, and check that in as
a separate patch, before checking in the core scheduler code.
Or we could just check it in and sort it out as things go, since this
is -unstable. :-)
Thoughts?
Either way I'll write up an e-mail describing some of the scheduler
path changes I'd like to see.
-George
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> On 07/12/2009 17:02, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Keir (and everyone), I think at this point it would be a good idea to
>> start a credit2 development branch in ext/ so we can keep a revision
>> history. Thoughts?
>
> Sounds like a reasonable idea, if you don't think it suitable just to check
> into mainline as the non-default scheduler.
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-08 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-07 17:02 [PATCH] [RFC] Credit2 scheduler prototype George Dunlap
2009-12-07 17:45 ` Keir Fraser
2009-12-08 14:48 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2009-12-08 18:20 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-13 14:48 ` George Dunlap
2010-01-13 15:16 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-13 16:05 ` George Dunlap
2010-01-13 16:36 ` Keir Fraser
2010-01-13 16:43 ` George Dunlap
2010-01-28 23:27 ` Dulloor
2010-01-29 0:56 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de76405a0912080648r4fc91cf9v876682a5383ac654@mail.gmail.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).