xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Move microcode loading earlier
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:12:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7e23edb-cc03-0812-79df-e5f7f68a76fe@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492530444-3900-1-git-send-email-ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>

On 18/04/17 16:47, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> Move microcode loading earlier for the boot CPU and secondary CPUs so
> that it takes place before identify_cpu() is called for each CPU.
> Without this, the detected features may be wrong if the new microcode
> loading adjusts the feature bits. That could mean that some fixes (e.g.
> d6e9f8d4f35d ("x86/vmx: fix vmentry failure with TSX bits in LBR"))
> don't work as expected.
>
> Previously during boot, the microcode loader was invoked for each
> secondary CPU started and then again for each CPU as part of an
> initcall. Simplify the code so that it is invoked exactly once for each
> CPU during boot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@citrix.com>

CC'ing Julien.  This should be taken in 4.9

This also resolves my LBR XTF test, so

Tested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Also, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, with 3
corrections (which I can fix on commit)

> @@ -409,50 +381,55 @@ static struct notifier_block microcode_percpu_nfb = {
>      .notifier_call = microcode_percpu_callback,
>  };
>  
> -static int __init microcode_presmp_init(void)
> +int __init early_microcode_update_cpu(bool_t start_update)

s/bool_t/bool/ throughout.

> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
> index 82559ed..4e01c7b 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
> @@ -83,22 +83,22 @@ static enum cpu_state {
>  
>  void *stack_base[NR_CPUS];
>  
> +void initialize_cpu_data(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +    *(cpu_data + cpu) = boot_cpu_data;

cpu_data[cpu] = boot_cpu_data;

> +}
> +
>  static void smp_store_cpu_info(int id)
>  {
> -    struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = cpu_data + id;
>      unsigned int socket;
>  
> -    *c = boot_cpu_data;
> -    if ( id != 0 )
> -    {
> -        identify_cpu(c);
> +    identify_cpu(cpu_data + id);

&cpu_data[id]

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-19 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-18 15:47 [PATCH] x86: Move microcode loading earlier Ross Lagerwall
2017-04-19 11:12 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2017-04-19 11:29   ` Julien Grall
2017-04-19 14:02 ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7e23edb-cc03-0812-79df-e5f7f68a76fe@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=ross.lagerwall@citrix.com \
    --cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).