xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] unsafe big.LITTLE support
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:03:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <edbc8066-397f-9aea-264b-3e27d052b56e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180308061458.GA25007@shlinux2>

Hello,

On 08/03/18 06:15, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 11:05:54AM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This series changes the initialization of two virtual registers to make
>> sure they match the value of the underlying physical cpu.
>>
>> It also disables cpus different from the boot cpu, unless a newly
>> introduced command line option is specified. In that case, it explains
>> how to setup the system to avoid corruptions, which involves manually
>> specifying the cpu affinity of all domains, because the scheduler still
>> lacks big.LITTLE support.
>>
>> In the uncommon case of a system where the cacheline sizes are different
>> across cores, it disables all cores that have a different dcache line size
>>from the boot cpu. In fact, it is not sufficient to use the dcache line
>> size of the current cpu, it would be necessary to use the minimum across
>> all dcache line sizes of all cores.  Given that it is actually uncommon
>> even in big.LITTLE systems, just disable cpus for now.
>>
>> The first patch in the series is a fix for the way we read the dcache
>> line size.
> 
> I am trying the patchset, but I meet issue that Guest Big/Little with
> vcpu not working properly. As my current hardware has an issue
> which has fix in Kernel, https://source.codeaurora.org/external/imx/linux-imx/commit/?h=imx_4.9.51_imx8_beta2&id=917cc3a8db2f3609ef8e2f59e7bcd31aa2cd4e59

Can you describe what you mean by not working properly? Also what is 
your setup? Did you pin the different vCPUs as requested by the 
documentation.

> 
> I am not sure whether this issue cause DomU big/Little not work.

Well, I would recommend to speak with NXP whether this errata affects 
TLB flush for Hypervisor Page-Table or Stage-2 Page-Table.

> So wonder has this patchset been tested on Big/Little Hardware?

This series only adds facility to report the correct MIDR to the guest. 
If your platform requires more, then it would be necessary send a patch 
for Xen.

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-08 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-02 19:05 [PATCH v4 0/7] unsafe big.LITTLE support Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] xen/arm: Read the dcache line size from CTR register Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-02 19:06   ` [PATCH v4 2/7] xen/arm: Park CPUs with a MIDR different from the boot CPU Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-02 19:06   ` [PATCH v4 3/7] xen/arm: make processor a per cpu variable Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-02 19:06   ` [PATCH v4 4/7] xen/arm: read ACTLR on the pcpu where the vcpu will run Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-02 19:06   ` [PATCH v4 5/7] xen/arm: set VPIDR based on the MIDR value of the underlying pCPU Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-02 19:06   ` [PATCH v4 6/7] xen/arm: update the docs about heterogeneous computing Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-02 19:06   ` [PATCH v4 7/7] xen/arm: disable CPUs with different dcache line sizes Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-06 10:59     ` Julien Grall
2018-03-06 19:41       ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-06 10:46   ` [PATCH v4 1/7] xen/arm: Read the dcache line size from CTR register Julien Grall
2018-03-08  6:15 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] unsafe big.LITTLE support Peng Fan
2018-03-08 11:03   ` Julien Grall [this message]
2018-03-08 12:23     ` Peng Fan
2018-03-08 12:30       ` Julien Grall
2018-03-08 12:43         ` Peng Fan
2018-03-08 15:13           ` Julien Grall
2018-03-09  9:05             ` Peng Fan
2018-03-09 10:22               ` Julien Grall
2018-03-09 13:30                 ` Peng Fan
2018-03-09 14:40                   ` Julien Grall
2018-03-10  1:09                     ` Stefano Stabellini
2018-03-12  2:57                       ` Peng Fan
2018-03-12 11:02                         ` Julien Grall
2018-03-12  2:32                     ` Peng Fan
2018-03-12 10:34                       ` Julien Grall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=edbc8066-397f-9aea-264b-3e27d052b56e@arm.com \
    --to=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=van.freenix@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).