From: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amd-iommu: Fix Guest CR3 Table following c/s 3a7947b6901
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:59:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee4f362c088747c29bf5fa46146350f0@AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ec03dbc-3b75-8718-bdf7-b379cd84ee53@citrix.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Cooper
> Sent: 04 April 2019 11:46
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>; Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>; Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; Roger Pau Monne
> <roger.pau@citrix.com>; Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] amd-iommu: Fix Guest CR3 Table following c/s 3a7947b6901
>
> On 04/04/2019 11:39, Paul Durrant wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.cooper3@citrix.com]
> >> Sent: 03 April 2019 19:08
> >> To: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
> >> Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>; Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>; Wei Liu
> >> <wei.liu2@citrix.com>; Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>; Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>;
> Paul
> >> Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH] amd-iommu: Fix Guest CR3 Table following c/s 3a7947b6901
> >>
> >> "amd-iommu: use a bitfield for DTE" renamed iommu_dte_set_guest_cr3()'s gcr3
> >> parameter to gcr3_mfn but ended up with an off-by-PAGE_SIZE error when
> >> extracting bits from the address.
> >>
> >> First of all, get_guest_cr3_from_dte() and iommu_dte_set_guest_cr3()
> >> are (almost) getters and setters for the same field, so should live together.
> >>
> >> Rename them to dte_{get,set}_gcr3_table() to specifically avoid 'guest_cr3' in
> >> the name. This field actually points to a table in memory containing an array
> >> of guest CR3 values. As these functions are used for different logical
> >> indirections, they shouldn't use gfn/mfn terminology for their parameters.
> >> Switch them to use straight uint64_t full addresses.
> >>
> >> Finally, correct the dte_set_gcr3_table() to use the proper shift. Express
> >> the shifts visually using MASK_EXTR() and literal masks, which IMO is the
> >> clearest way to express the logic.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> >> ---
> >> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> >> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
> >> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> >> CC: Brian Woods <brian.woods@amd.com>
> >> CC: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>
> >>
> >> This code is unreachable, so completely untestable, but I think the end result
> >> is better than it was previously.
> >> ---
> >> xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_guest.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_map.c | 21 ------------------
> >> xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/svm/amd-iommu-proto.h | 2 --
> >> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_guest.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_guest.c
> >> index 328e750..4691e8f 100644
> >> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_guest.c
> >> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_guest.c
> >> @@ -76,10 +76,34 @@ static void guest_iommu_disable(struct guest_iommu *iommu)
> >> iommu->enabled = 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static uint64_t get_guest_cr3_from_dte(struct amd_iommu_dte *dte)
> >> +/*
> >> + * The Guest CR3 Table is a table written by the guest kernel, pointing at
> >> + * gCR3 values for PASID transactions to use. The Device Table Entry points
> >> + * at a system physical address.
> >> + *
> >> + * However, these helpers deliberately use untyped parameters without
> >> + * reference to gfn/mfn because they are used both for programming the real
> >> + * IOMMU, and interpreting a guests programming of its vIOMMU.
> >> + */
> >> +static uint64_t dte_get_gcr3_table(const struct amd_iommu_dte *dte)
> >> {
> >> return ((dte->gcr3_trp_51_31 << 31) | (dte->gcr3_trp_30_15 << 15) |
> >> - (dte->gcr3_trp_14_12 << 12)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >> + (dte->gcr3_trp_14_12 << 12));
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void dte_set_gcr3_table(struct amd_iommu_dte *dte, uint16_t dom_id,
> >> + uint64_t addr, uint8_t gv, uint8_t glx)
> >> +{
> >> + /* I bit must be set when gcr3 is enabled */
> >> + dte->i = 1;
> >> +
> >> + dte->gcr3_trp_14_12 = MASK_EXTR(addr, 0x0000000000007000ull);
> >> + dte->gcr3_trp_30_15 = MASK_EXTR(addr, 0x000000007fff8000ull);
> >> + dte->gcr3_trp_51_31 = MASK_EXTR(addr, 0x000fffff80000000ull);
> > I'm not a fan of the big hex values
>
> Except they are very very deliberate to avoid the possibility of
> repeating the previous mistake, and avoid any confusion about how addr
> should be interpreted.
The problem is that looking at 0x000000007fff8000, it doesn't immediately spring out at you that the top bit is 30 (although it's a bit more obvious that the bottom bit is 15). IMO a macro that takes the stated high and low bits and hands you back an inclusive mask can be more easily reasoned about. Let's see what others think...
Paul
>
> ~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-04 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-03 18:08 [PATCH] amd-iommu: Fix Guest CR3 Table following c/s 3a7947b6901 Andrew Cooper
2019-04-04 10:39 ` Paul Durrant
2019-04-04 10:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-04-04 10:59 ` Paul Durrant [this message]
2019-04-04 11:41 ` Jan Beulich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-11-20 14:19 Andrew Cooper
2020-11-20 14:32 ` Jan Beulich
2020-11-20 14:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2020-11-20 14:46 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee4f362c088747c29bf5fa46146350f0@AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net \
--to=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=brian.woods@amd.com \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).