xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@citrix.com>
To: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/12] Nested p2m: allow sharing between vCPUs
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 18:03:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbaef770-f7f5-3f4e-0844-76c6ec201ea3@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170718103429.25020-1-sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>

On 07/18/2017 11:34 AM, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
> Nested p2m (shadow EPT) is an object that stores memory address
> translations from L2 GPA directly to L0 HPA. This is achieved by
> combining together L1 EPT tables with L0 EPT during L2 EPT violations.
> 
> In the usual case, L1 uses the same EPTP value in VMCS12 for all vCPUs
> of a L2 guest. But unfortunately, in current Xen's implementation, each
> vCPU has its own n2pm object which cannot be shared with other vCPUs.
> This leads to the following issues if a nested guest has SMP:
> 
>     1. There will be multiple np2m objects (1 per nested vCPU) with
>        the same np2m_base (L1 EPTP value in VMCS12).
> 
>     2. Same EPT violations will be processed independently by each vCPU.
> 
>     3. Since MAX_NESTEDP2M is defined as 10, if a domain has more than
>        10 nested vCPUs, performance will be extremely degraded due to
>        constant np2m LRU list thrashing and np2m flushing.
> 
> This patch series makes it possible to share one np2m object between
> different vCPUs that have the same np2m_base. Sharing of np2m objects
> improves scalability of a domain from 10 nested vCPUs to 10 nested
> guests (with arbitrary number of vCPUs per guest).

On the whole this looks like a decent approach.

Were you planning on re-sending it with the RFC removed, or would you
like me to do a detailed review of this series as it is?

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-28 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18 10:34 [PATCH RFC 00/12] Nested p2m: allow sharing between vCPUs Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 01/12] x86/np2m: refactor p2m_get_nestedp2m() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 02/12] x86/np2m: add np2m_flush_eptp() Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-01  7:55   ` Egger, Christoph
2017-08-03 14:18     ` Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-03 14:40       ` Jan Beulich
2017-08-28 16:08   ` George Dunlap
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 03/12] x86/vvmx: use np2m_flush_eptp() for INVEPT_SINGLE_CONTEXT Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 04/12] x86/np2m: remove np2m_base from p2m_get_nestedp2m() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 05/12] x86/np2m: add np2m_generation Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 16:18   ` George Dunlap
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 06/12] x86/vvmx: add stale_eptp flag Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 16:31   ` George Dunlap
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 07/12] x86/np2m: add np2m_schedule_in/out() Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 16:42   ` George Dunlap
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 08/12] x86/np2m: add p2m_get_nestedp2m_locked() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 09/12] x86/np2m: improve nestedhvm_hap_nested_page_fault() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 10/12] x86/np2m: implement sharing of np2m between vCPUs Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 16:59   ` George Dunlap
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 11/12] x86/np2m: add break to np2m_flush_eptp() Sergey Dyasli
2017-07-18 10:34 ` [PATCH RFC 12/12] x86/vvmx: remove EPTP write from ept_handle_violation() Sergey Dyasli
2017-08-28 17:03 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2017-08-29 13:39   ` [PATCH RFC 00/12] Nested p2m: allow sharing between vCPUs Sergey Dyasli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fbaef770-f7f5-3f4e-0844-76c6ec201ea3@citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
    --cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).