From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jun Koi <junkoi2004@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Failed to create a domain with xen-unstable (Error
	22: Invalid argument)
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:40:51 +0900
Message-ID: <fdaac4d51001132340vd2112abv6f12a1a771263afb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <fdaac4d51001131957t5ccaf73p8304bce98750b5e7@mail.gmail.com>
	<2ab84cd81001132106w3558246bidc2dc7004a0658f6@mail.gmail.com>
	<6CADD16F56BC954D8E28F3836FA7ED7112A7932ED8@shzsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <6CADD16F56BC954D8E28F3836FA7ED7112A7932ED8@shzsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@intel.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Xu, Dongxiao <dongxiao.xu@intel.com> wrote:
> Yes, one VM could own maxium 128 vcpus.
> The failure you meet should be a regression. I am looking into it.

Thanks! Let me know if you need more information.

Anyway, I am wondering how a simple bug like this can evade the
auto-testing process??

Jun